Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/cog 186 run cognee on windows #449

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

hajdul88
Copy link
Contributor

@hajdul88 hajdul88 commented Jan 17, 2025

Description

This PR solves the problem of running cognee on windows

DCO Affirmation

I affirm that all code in every commit of this pull request conforms to the terms of the Topoteretes Developer Certificate of Origin

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Updated event loop management in multiple Python example scripts
    • Improved logging configuration across example files
  • Documentation

    • Updated README.md with:
      • Clearer installation instructions
      • Expanded usage examples
      • Updated database implementation status table
  • Infrastructure

    • Enhanced LanceDB database adapter with improved collection management
    • Modified entrypoint script to remove commented-out migration code

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@hajdul88 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0b56e4b and b0634da.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (6 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request encompasses changes across multiple files in the Cognee project, focusing on event loop management, logging, and database adapter modifications. The changes primarily involve updating asynchronous execution patterns in example scripts, introducing logging capabilities, and enhancing the LanceDB vector database adapter's functionality. The modifications aim to improve code structure, resource management, and provide more explicit control over asynchronous operations.

Changes

File Change Summary
cognee/infrastructure/databases/vector/lancedb/LanceDBAdapter.py Modified get_distance_from_collection_elements to limit search results using collection.count_rows(). Updated prune method to thoroughly clean up database collections.
examples/python/*_example.py Replaced asyncio.run() with manual event loop management. Added logging setup using setup_logging(). Introduced more explicit event loop lifecycle control.
entrypoint.sh Removed commented-out Alembic migration code. Adjusted script formatting.
README.md Updated installation instructions, usage examples, and database implementation state documentation.

Possibly related issues

  • [COG-186] Run cognee on Windows #115: Potential connection to Windows compatibility improvements, as the changes include more robust event loop management and logging setup which could help with cross-platform execution.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • borisarzentar
  • dexters1
  • alekszievr
  • lxobr
  • Vasilije1990

Poem

🐰 Async loops dance with grace,
Event management finds its place
Databases pruned, logs shine bright
CodeRabbit's magic takes its flight!
Refactoring code with bunny might 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7c3e46f and 6e69188.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • cognee/infrastructure/databases/vector/lancedb/LanceDBAdapter.py (2 hunks)
  • examples/python/dynamic_steps_example.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: run_multimedia_example_test / test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: docker-compose-test
🔇 Additional comments (3)
examples/python/dynamic_steps_example.py (1)

207-212: Excellent Windows compatibility fix for event loop management!

This change properly addresses event loop handling on Windows by:

  1. Explicitly creating a new event loop
  2. Setting it as the current loop
  3. Ensuring proper cleanup with shutdown_asyncgens

This is a recommended pattern for Windows compatibility as it avoids issues with the default asyncio.run().

cognee/infrastructure/databases/vector/lancedb/LanceDBAdapter.py (2)

155-157: Good addition of collection size limit!

Adding collection_size as the limit ensures we don't try to fetch more results than available, preventing potential memory issues. This is particularly important for resource management across different platforms.


264-264: Verify Windows path handling across the codebase

Let's check for other potential Windows path compatibility issues in the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

Path handling appears to be Windows-compatible

The codebase demonstrates proper path handling practices:

  • Uses platform-independent os.path.join() for path concatenation
  • Forward slash checks are used appropriately for protocol/scheme detection
  • The url parameter in LocalStorage.remove_all() is a database URL, not a filesystem path
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for hardcoded forward slashes in path operations
rg -l "startswith\(['\"]/" --type py

# Search for path string operations that might break on Windows
rg -l "\.startswith\(['\"][/\\]" --type py

# Search for path joins using string concatenation
rg -l "['\"][/\\].*\+" --type py

Length of output: 510


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the context of forward slash usage in the identified files
rg -C 3 "startswith\(['\"]/" cognee/tasks/ingestion/save_data_item_with_metadata_to_storage.py cognee/tasks/ingestion/save_data_item_to_storage.py cognee/api/v1/add/add.py cognee/infrastructure/databases/vector/lancedb/LanceDBAdapter.py

# Look for proper path handling imports and usage
rg -l "^from pathlib import|^import os\.path|^from os\.path|^import pathlib" --type py

# Search for os.path.join usage
rg "os\.path\.join\(" --type py

Length of output: 11100

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cognee/tests/integration/documents/AudioDocument_test.py (1)

39-47: LGTM! Consider adding Windows-specific test cases.

The assertion formatting changes look good. However, since this PR aims to add Windows support, consider adding test cases that verify audio processing functionality specifically on Windows paths (e.g., paths with backslashes and drive letters).

Example test case to add:

def test_AudioDocument_windows_path():
    windows_path = "C:\\Users\\Test\\audio.mp3"
    document = AudioDocument(
        id=uuid.uuid4(),
        name="audio-windows-test",
        raw_data_location=windows_path,
        metadata_id=uuid.uuid4(),
        mime_type="audio/mp3",
    )
    with patch.object(AudioDocument, "create_transcript", return_value=TEST_TEXT):
        # Verify the document can be processed with Windows path
        results = list(document.read(chunk_size=64, chunker="text_chunker"))
        assert len(results) > 0
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6e69188 and 4ea01b9.

📒 Files selected for processing (17)
  • cognee/tests/integration/documents/AudioDocument_test.py (1 hunks)
  • cognee/tests/integration/documents/ImageDocument_test.py (1 hunks)
  • cognee/tests/integration/documents/PdfDocument_test.py (1 hunks)
  • cognee/tests/integration/documents/TextDocument_test.py (1 hunks)
  • cognee/tests/integration/documents/UnstructuredDocument_test.py (1 hunks)
  • cognee/tests/test_deduplication.py (2 hunks)
  • cognee/tests/test_falkordb.py (1 hunks)
  • cognee/tests/test_library.py (1 hunks)
  • cognee/tests/test_pgvector.py (2 hunks)
  • cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_paragraph_2_test.py (3 hunks)
  • cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_paragraph_test.py (1 hunks)
  • cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_sentence_test.py (2 hunks)
  • cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_word_test.py (1 hunks)
  • entrypoint.sh (1 hunks)
  • examples/python/graphiti_example.py (1 hunks)
  • examples/python/multimedia_example.py (2 hunks)
  • examples/python/simple_example.py (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
  • cognee/tests/test_falkordb.py
  • cognee/tests/test_library.py
  • cognee/tests/integration/documents/PdfDocument_test.py
  • entrypoint.sh
  • cognee/tests/integration/documents/ImageDocument_test.py
  • cognee/tests/test_pgvector.py
  • cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_paragraph_2_test.py
  • cognee/tests/test_deduplication.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_paragraph_test.py (1)
Learnt from: 0xideas
PR: topoteretes/cognee#205
File: cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_paragraph_test.py:7-7
Timestamp: 2024-11-13T14:55:05.912Z
Learning: When changes are made to the chunking implementation in `cognee/tasks/chunks`, the ground truth values in the corresponding tests in `cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks` need to be updated accordingly.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (17)
  • GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
  • GitHub Check: run_dynamic_steps_example_test / test
  • GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
  • GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
  • GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: profiler
  • GitHub Check: docker-compose-test
  • GitHub Check: Publish Cognee Docker image
🔇 Additional comments (12)
examples/python/multimedia_example.py (2)

4-4: LGTM: Logging setup added for better error tracking.

The addition of logging capabilities will help diagnose issues across different platforms.

Also applies to: 8-8


50-56: LGTM: Improved event loop management for Windows compatibility.

The changes properly handle event loop lifecycle on Windows by:

  1. Explicitly creating and managing the event loop
  2. Ensuring cleanup of async generators in a finally block

This addresses potential issues with asyncio.run() on Windows, which can sometimes fail to properly clean up resources.

examples/python/simple_example.py (2)

3-3: LGTM: Consistent logging setup across examples.

The logging setup matches other example files, maintaining consistency.

Also applies to: 5-5


71-77: LGTM: Consistent event loop management for Windows compatibility.

The event loop management follows the same pattern as other examples, ensuring proper resource cleanup on Windows.

examples/python/graphiti_example.py (1)

72-77: LGTM: Critical event loop management for complex async operations.

The explicit event loop management is especially important in this example due to:

  1. Multiple async operations
  2. Use of async generators in the pipeline
  3. Need for proper resource cleanup on Windows

The shutdown_asyncgens() call in the finally block ensures that async generators used in the pipeline are properly cleaned up, preventing resource leaks on Windows.

cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_word_test.py (1)

20-22: LGTM! Clear and informative assertion message.

The reformatted assertion maintains the same functionality while providing clear debugging information about text length mismatches.

cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_sentence_test.py (1)

19-21: LGTM! Well-structured assertion messages.

The reformatted assertions maintain the same functionality while providing clear debugging information about text length mismatches and chunk size violations.

Also applies to: 39-41

cognee/tests/integration/documents/TextDocument_test.py (1)

42-50: LGTM! Comprehensive assertion messages.

The reformatted assertions maintain the same functionality while providing clear debugging information about mismatches in word count, text length, and cut type.

cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_paragraph_test.py (2)

61-63: LGTM! Clear assertion message and up-to-date ground truth.

The reformatted assertion maintains the same functionality while providing clear debugging information about mismatches in text content, word count, and cut type. The ground truth values appear to be in sync with the current chunking implementation.


Line range hint 1-1: Please clarify how these changes enable Windows compatibility.

The changes appear to be focused on improving test assertion readability, but it's not clear how they contribute to enabling cognee to run on Windows. Could you explain the connection or if there are additional changes needed?

cognee/tests/integration/documents/UnstructuredDocument_test.py (2)

74-76: LGTM! Assertion formatting improvements.

The reformatting of assertions improves readability while maintaining the same functionality.

Also applies to: 82-84, 89-94, 100-102


Line range hint 8-14: Path handling looks good for Windows compatibility.

The use of os.path.join, os.sep, and platform-agnostic path manipulation is correct for ensuring Windows compatibility.

Let's verify the test data paths exist on Windows:

Also applies to: 15-21, 22-28, 29-35

✅ Verification successful

Path handling and test files verified successfully

The test data files (example.pptx, example.docx, example.csv, example.xlsx) exist at the expected location and are accessible. The path construction in the code is correct and Windows-compatible.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify test data files exist and are accessible
# Note: Using forward slashes as they work on both Unix and Windows

# Find test data directory
fd -t d "test_data$" 

# List files in test data directory to verify they exist
fd -t f "^example\.(pptx|docx|csv|xlsx)$"

Length of output: 233

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

Line range hint 143-171: Enhanced example with clear progress tracking

The improved example script with detailed progress tracking and step-by-step explanations is excellent. This helps users understand the execution flow better.

However, consider adding Windows-specific notes about:

  1. File path handling (potential backslash issues)
  2. Any special considerations for async operations on Windows
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4ea01b9 and 0b56e4b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (6 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (17)
  • GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
  • GitHub Check: run_multimedia_example_test / test
  • GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
  • GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: run_dynamic_steps_example_test / test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: docker-compose-test
  • GitHub Check: profiler
🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)

Line range hint 88-92: Good addition of programmatic configuration!

The new programmatic method for setting the LLM API key is a welcome addition, especially beneficial for Windows users who might face environment variable issues. This provides better flexibility in configuration management.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)

89-89: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


261-270: Comprehensive database compatibility matrix

The new database compatibility table clearly shows the implementation state across different operating systems. This is particularly valuable for the Windows support initiative.

Some observations:

  1. PGVector is marked as unstable on Windows - consider adding known issues
  2. Several databases are marked as "Untested" on Windows - consider prioritizing testing for these

Let's verify if there are any open issues related to the untested databases on Windows:

@Vasilije1990 Vasilije1990 merged commit ffa3c2d into dev Jan 17, 2025
26 checks passed
@Vasilije1990 Vasilije1990 deleted the feature/cog-186-run-cognee-on-windows branch January 17, 2025 13:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants