-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/cog 186 run cognee on windows #449
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@hajdul88 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis pull request encompasses changes across multiple files in the Cognee project, focusing on event loop management, logging, and database adapter modifications. The changes primarily involve updating asynchronous execution patterns in example scripts, introducing logging capabilities, and enhancing the LanceDB vector database adapter's functionality. The modifications aim to improve code structure, resource management, and provide more explicit control over asynchronous operations. Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
cognee/infrastructure/databases/vector/lancedb/LanceDBAdapter.py
(2 hunks)examples/python/dynamic_steps_example.py
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
- GitHub Check: run_multimedia_example_test / test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: docker-compose-test
🔇 Additional comments (3)
examples/python/dynamic_steps_example.py (1)
207-212
: Excellent Windows compatibility fix for event loop management!This change properly addresses event loop handling on Windows by:
- Explicitly creating a new event loop
- Setting it as the current loop
- Ensuring proper cleanup with
shutdown_asyncgens
This is a recommended pattern for Windows compatibility as it avoids issues with the default
asyncio.run()
.cognee/infrastructure/databases/vector/lancedb/LanceDBAdapter.py (2)
155-157
: Good addition of collection size limit!Adding
collection_size
as the limit ensures we don't try to fetch more results than available, preventing potential memory issues. This is particularly important for resource management across different platforms.
264-264
: Verify Windows path handling across the codebaseLet's check for other potential Windows path compatibility issues in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Path handling appears to be Windows-compatible
The codebase demonstrates proper path handling practices:
- Uses platform-independent
os.path.join()
for path concatenation- Forward slash checks are used appropriately for protocol/scheme detection
- The
url
parameter inLocalStorage.remove_all()
is a database URL, not a filesystem path🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for hardcoded forward slashes in path operations rg -l "startswith\(['\"]/" --type py # Search for path string operations that might break on Windows rg -l "\.startswith\(['\"][/\\]" --type py # Search for path joins using string concatenation rg -l "['\"][/\\].*\+" --type pyLength of output: 510
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the context of forward slash usage in the identified files rg -C 3 "startswith\(['\"]/" cognee/tasks/ingestion/save_data_item_with_metadata_to_storage.py cognee/tasks/ingestion/save_data_item_to_storage.py cognee/api/v1/add/add.py cognee/infrastructure/databases/vector/lancedb/LanceDBAdapter.py # Look for proper path handling imports and usage rg -l "^from pathlib import|^import os\.path|^from os\.path|^import pathlib" --type py # Search for os.path.join usage rg "os\.path\.join\(" --type pyLength of output: 11100
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cognee/tests/integration/documents/AudioDocument_test.py (1)
39-47
: LGTM! Consider adding Windows-specific test cases.The assertion formatting changes look good. However, since this PR aims to add Windows support, consider adding test cases that verify audio processing functionality specifically on Windows paths (e.g., paths with backslashes and drive letters).
Example test case to add:
def test_AudioDocument_windows_path(): windows_path = "C:\\Users\\Test\\audio.mp3" document = AudioDocument( id=uuid.uuid4(), name="audio-windows-test", raw_data_location=windows_path, metadata_id=uuid.uuid4(), mime_type="audio/mp3", ) with patch.object(AudioDocument, "create_transcript", return_value=TEST_TEXT): # Verify the document can be processed with Windows path results = list(document.read(chunk_size=64, chunker="text_chunker")) assert len(results) > 0
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
cognee/tests/integration/documents/AudioDocument_test.py
(1 hunks)cognee/tests/integration/documents/ImageDocument_test.py
(1 hunks)cognee/tests/integration/documents/PdfDocument_test.py
(1 hunks)cognee/tests/integration/documents/TextDocument_test.py
(1 hunks)cognee/tests/integration/documents/UnstructuredDocument_test.py
(1 hunks)cognee/tests/test_deduplication.py
(2 hunks)cognee/tests/test_falkordb.py
(1 hunks)cognee/tests/test_library.py
(1 hunks)cognee/tests/test_pgvector.py
(2 hunks)cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_paragraph_2_test.py
(3 hunks)cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_paragraph_test.py
(1 hunks)cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_sentence_test.py
(2 hunks)cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_word_test.py
(1 hunks)entrypoint.sh
(1 hunks)examples/python/graphiti_example.py
(1 hunks)examples/python/multimedia_example.py
(2 hunks)examples/python/simple_example.py
(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- cognee/tests/test_falkordb.py
- cognee/tests/test_library.py
- cognee/tests/integration/documents/PdfDocument_test.py
- entrypoint.sh
- cognee/tests/integration/documents/ImageDocument_test.py
- cognee/tests/test_pgvector.py
- cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_paragraph_2_test.py
- cognee/tests/test_deduplication.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_paragraph_test.py (1)
Learnt from: 0xideas
PR: topoteretes/cognee#205
File: cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_paragraph_test.py:7-7
Timestamp: 2024-11-13T14:55:05.912Z
Learning: When changes are made to the chunking implementation in `cognee/tasks/chunks`, the ground truth values in the corresponding tests in `cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks` need to be updated accordingly.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (17)
- GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
- GitHub Check: run_dynamic_steps_example_test / test
- GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
- GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
- GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: profiler
- GitHub Check: docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: Publish Cognee Docker image
🔇 Additional comments (12)
examples/python/multimedia_example.py (2)
4-4
: LGTM: Logging setup added for better error tracking.The addition of logging capabilities will help diagnose issues across different platforms.
Also applies to: 8-8
50-56
: LGTM: Improved event loop management for Windows compatibility.The changes properly handle event loop lifecycle on Windows by:
- Explicitly creating and managing the event loop
- Ensuring cleanup of async generators in a
finally
blockThis addresses potential issues with
asyncio.run()
on Windows, which can sometimes fail to properly clean up resources.examples/python/simple_example.py (2)
3-3
: LGTM: Consistent logging setup across examples.The logging setup matches other example files, maintaining consistency.
Also applies to: 5-5
71-77
: LGTM: Consistent event loop management for Windows compatibility.The event loop management follows the same pattern as other examples, ensuring proper resource cleanup on Windows.
examples/python/graphiti_example.py (1)
72-77
: LGTM: Critical event loop management for complex async operations.The explicit event loop management is especially important in this example due to:
- Multiple async operations
- Use of async generators in the pipeline
- Need for proper resource cleanup on Windows
The
shutdown_asyncgens()
call in thefinally
block ensures that async generators used in the pipeline are properly cleaned up, preventing resource leaks on Windows.cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_word_test.py (1)
20-22
: LGTM! Clear and informative assertion message.The reformatted assertion maintains the same functionality while providing clear debugging information about text length mismatches.
cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_sentence_test.py (1)
19-21
: LGTM! Well-structured assertion messages.The reformatted assertions maintain the same functionality while providing clear debugging information about text length mismatches and chunk size violations.
Also applies to: 39-41
cognee/tests/integration/documents/TextDocument_test.py (1)
42-50
: LGTM! Comprehensive assertion messages.The reformatted assertions maintain the same functionality while providing clear debugging information about mismatches in word count, text length, and cut type.
cognee/tests/unit/processing/chunks/chunk_by_paragraph_test.py (2)
61-63
: LGTM! Clear assertion message and up-to-date ground truth.The reformatted assertion maintains the same functionality while providing clear debugging information about mismatches in text content, word count, and cut type. The ground truth values appear to be in sync with the current chunking implementation.
Line range hint
1-1
: Please clarify how these changes enable Windows compatibility.The changes appear to be focused on improving test assertion readability, but it's not clear how they contribute to enabling cognee to run on Windows. Could you explain the connection or if there are additional changes needed?
cognee/tests/integration/documents/UnstructuredDocument_test.py (2)
74-76
: LGTM! Assertion formatting improvements.The reformatting of assertions improves readability while maintaining the same functionality.
Also applies to: 82-84, 89-94, 100-102
Line range hint
8-14
: Path handling looks good for Windows compatibility.The use of
os.path.join
,os.sep
, and platform-agnostic path manipulation is correct for ensuring Windows compatibility.Let's verify the test data paths exist on Windows:
Also applies to: 15-21, 22-28, 29-35
✅ Verification successful
Path handling and test files verified successfully
The test data files (example.pptx, example.docx, example.csv, example.xlsx) exist at the expected location and are accessible. The path construction in the code is correct and Windows-compatible.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test data files exist and are accessible # Note: Using forward slashes as they work on both Unix and Windows # Find test data directory fd -t d "test_data$" # List files in test data directory to verify they exist fd -t f "^example\.(pptx|docx|csv|xlsx)$"Length of output: 233
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
Line range hint
143-171
: Enhanced example with clear progress trackingThe improved example script with detailed progress tracking and step-by-step explanations is excellent. This helps users understand the execution flow better.
However, consider adding Windows-specific notes about:
- File path handling (potential backslash issues)
- Any special considerations for async operations on Windows
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md
(6 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (17)
- GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
- GitHub Check: run_multimedia_example_test / test
- GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
- GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: run_dynamic_steps_example_test / test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: docker-compose-test
- GitHub Check: profiler
🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)
Line range hint
88-92
: Good addition of programmatic configuration!The new programmatic method for setting the LLM API key is a welcome addition, especially beneficial for Windows users who might face environment variable issues. This provides better flexibility in configuration management.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
89-89: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
261-270
: Comprehensive database compatibility matrixThe new database compatibility table clearly shows the implementation state across different operating systems. This is particularly valuable for the Windows support initiative.
Some observations:
- PGVector is marked as unstable on Windows - consider adding known issues
- Several databases are marked as "Untested" on Windows - consider prioritizing testing for these
Let's verify if there are any open issues related to the untested databases on Windows:
Description
This PR solves the problem of running cognee on windows
DCO Affirmation
I affirm that all code in every commit of this pull request conforms to the terms of the Topoteretes Developer Certificate of Origin
Summary by CodeRabbit
Chores
Documentation
Infrastructure