-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 359
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: update MemberUtil isBrb #4071
Conversation
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
warning [email protected]: This version is no longer supported. Please see https://eslint.org/version-support for other options. (For a CapTP with native promises, see @endo/eventual-send and @endo/captp) 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces a modification to the Correspondingly, a new test case is added to the unit tests for the Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
This pull request is automatically being deployed by Amplify Hosting (learn more). |
@antsukanova , could you expand a little on the manual tests performed? Will be helpful |
@adhmenon I have added context in the description, but this PR needed to fix client e2e test cases that don't work when controls are undefined, you check here details here https://sqbu-github.cisco.com/WebExSquared/webex-web-client/pull/7404 |
COMPLETES
This pull request addresses
This PR fixes an issue with client flows that have cases where locus
participant.controls
is undefined forisBrb
.by making the following changes
Fixes issue with
participant.controls
and adds check for undefined controlsChange Type
The following scenarios were tested
I certified that
I have read and followed contributing guidelines
I discussed changes with code owners prior to submitting this pull request
I have not skipped any automated checks
All existing and new tests passed
I have updated the documentation accordingly
Make sure to have followed the contributing guidelines before submitting.