-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pulsarify all tools in the repo #281
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
pulsarify all tools in the repo #281
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @martenson. Can you maybe come up with a small script to detect those tools. We probably want to add this to more tools.
in a version roughly from the same timeline
slesh is already part of the macro, not sure if this can faiil sometimes, but this commit should be correct always
@bgruening done |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That looks great!
@martenson is there still an issue or do you have some idea why the tests are failing? |
@hechth I am not aware of any issue and I do not have access to this repo to troubleshoot tests. |
1955eec
to
86d7eeb
Compare
Many tools' linting is failing because we are touching many tools now. Of course, it would be nice to fix those, but I can also understand if you just want to merge it. |
I took care to not break the linting with my modifications and I do not have the availability to fully re-lint all tools I am fixing here. |
pulsar needs to explicitly know about the files included in the command, this PR adds this information to all tools in the repo that are missing it (some already had it)
While having a look a this I also found some minor inconsistencies in requirements and syntax, check the later commits for details.
closes #279
FOR CONTRIBUTOR: