Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve applications list performance #4348

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

mxm-tr
Copy link

@mxm-tr mxm-tr commented Nov 24, 2022

Proposed changes in this pull request

Fix for

Instead of performing a call to the User store for each Application role, it is performed once.
On our installation it reduced the loading time of the Service Providers list by a large factor (x1000), as the user store we are using had large amount of application roles configured.

When should this PR be merged

ASAP

Checklist (for reviewing)

General

  • Is this PR explained thoroughly? All code changes must be accounted for in the PR description.
  • Is the PR labeled correctly?

Functionality

  • Are all requirements met? Compare implemented functionality with the requirements specification.
  • Does the UI work as expected? There should be no Javascript errors in the console; all resources should load. There should be no unexpected errors. Deliberately try to break the feature to find out if there are corner cases that are not handled.

Code

  • Do you fully understand the introduced changes to the code? If not ask for clarification, it might uncover ways to solve a problem in a more elegant and efficient way.
  • Does the PR introduce any inefficient database requests? Use the debug server to check for duplicate requests.
  • Are all necessary strings marked for translation? All strings that are exposed to users via the UI must be marked for translation.

Tests

  • Are there sufficient test cases? Ensure that all components are tested individually; models, forms, and serializers should be tested in isolation even if a test for a view covers these components.
  • If this is a bug fix, are tests for the issue in place? There must be a test case for the bug to ensure the issue won’t regress. Make sure that the tests break without the new code to fix the issue.
  • If this is a new feature or a significant change to an existing feature? has the manual testing spreadsheet been updated with instructions for manual testing?

Security

  • Confirm this PR doesn't commit any keys, passwords, tokens, usernames, or other secrets.
  • Are all UI and API inputs run through forms or serializers?
  • Are all external inputs validated and sanitized appropriately?
  • Does all branching logic have a default case?
  • Does this solution handle outliers and edge cases gracefully?
  • Are all external communications secured and restricted to SSL?

Documentation

  • Are changes to the UI documented in the platform docs? If this PR introduces new platform site functionality or changes existing ones, the changes should be documented.
  • Are changes to the API documented in the API docs? If this PR introduces new API functionality or changes existing ones, the changes must be documented.
  • Are reusable components documented? If this PR introduces components that are relevant to other developers (for instance a mixin for a view or a generic form) they should be documented in the Wiki.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Nov 24, 2022

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@sadilchamishka
Copy link
Contributor

sadilchamishka commented Dec 29, 2022

This PR is initiated as a fix for the original issue of executing the getRoleListOfUser((username) method repeatedly.

}
return appInfo;

return ApplicationMgtUtil.filterApplicationsForUser(applicationBasicInfos, userName);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
return ApplicationMgtUtil.filterApplicationsForUser(applicationBasicInfos, userName);
return ApplicationMgtUtil.filterUserAuthorizedApplications(applicationBasicInfos, userName);

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Calling another method from this method without any additional steps doesn't seem fine. Either the new method could have been call from where the getAuthorizedApplicationBasicInfo method was called.

if (userStoreManager instanceof AbstractUserStoreManager) {
try {

String[] userRolesAbstractUSM = (((AbstractUserStoreManager) userStoreManager)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why it is required to cast and invoke the getRoleListOfUser method. The results would be same as Line 173.

String[] userRolesAbstractUSM = (((AbstractUserStoreManager) userStoreManager)
.getRoleListOfUser(username));

// Merge the lists
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the above comment is valid, there is no point of merging. Also these operations will be costly when there large number of roles assigned for the user.

+ " by retrieving role list of " + "user : " + username);
}

for (String userRole : userRoles) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can improve the code using Java streams APIs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants