Add Permission Validation for Hybrid User Role Deletion

[BimsaraBodaragama]

Proposed changes in this pull request

• Added getPermittedUserNamesToBeDeleted to validate and retrieve user names allowed for deletion based on role and organizational restrictions.
• Implemented dynamic SQL queries to handle restricted and unrestricted user deletion permissions.
• Integrated permission checks into the hybrid user role deletion process to ensure only authorized users are deleted.

When should this PR be merged

• This PR can be merged after a review and successful validation of the changes.

Follow up actions

• Validate the functionality in relevant test scenarios to ensure correct behavior. (Can verify with the user sharing feature)

---

Related Issue

Add Permission Validation for Hybrid User Role Deletion

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 37.50000% with 55 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 46.42%. Comparing base (368134f) to head (a6c313d).
Report is 419 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...bon/identity/role/v2/mgt/core/dao/RoleDAOImpl.java	45.83%	39 Missing ⚠️
...ty/role/v2/mgt/core/RoleManagementServiceImpl.java	0.00%	15 Missing ⚠️
.../carbon/identity/role/v2/mgt/core/dao/RoleDAO.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #6303      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     45.91%   46.42%   +0.51%     
- Complexity    14481    14740     +259     
============================================
  Files          1672     1677       +5     
  Lines        103141   104055     +914     
  Branches      18010    18316     +306     
============================================
+ Hits          47360    48311     +951     
+ Misses        48970    48863     -107     
- Partials       6811     6881      +70     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	29.59% <37.50%> (+0.42%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[BimsaraBodaragama]

[Quality Gate failed]
This error comes from code duplication in the RoleManegementService and RoleDAO since they share the same code. Yet, this is not only because of my new code but also because of the overall.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
7 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
2.1% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[BimsaraBodaragama]

After further evaluation, this functionality is no longer required as the intended use case is now being handled through alternative approaches within the system. As a result, this PR will be closed. Thank you to everyone who reviewed and contributed to this effort.