-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix to handle error on undefined type reference #7
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces significant modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
antlr/YorkieSchemaLexer.tokens (1)
Line range hint
1-69
: Summary: Significant restructuring of lexer tokens - proceed with caution.The changes to
YorkieSchemaLexer.tokens
represent a substantial restructuring of the grammar's token definitions. Key points:
- Addition of a new token (T__30).
- Consistent renumbering of existing tokens.
- Significant changes to token string representations, including reordering and the addition of new tokens like 'Array'.
While these changes appear intentional and consistent, they may have far-reaching effects on the entire parsing system and any dependent tools. It's crucial to:
- Thoroughly test all components of the system that interact with these token definitions.
- Update any documentation that references specific token numbers or names.
- Communicate these changes clearly to any users or developers of the grammar.
Consider maintaining a changelog for grammar modifications, especially for breaking changes like these. This can help users of the grammar adapt their systems more easily.
antlr/YorkieSchemaLexer.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-270
: Summary: Lexer updated to support new 'extends' keyword.The changes in this file consistently implement the addition of a new token (
T__30
) and the 'extends' keyword. These modifications suggest an enhancement to the grammar, possibly introducing inheritance or extension capabilities. The updates to token indices, rule names, literal names, and symbolic names are all consistent with this change.To ensure the correctness of these changes:
- Verify that the corresponding changes have been made in the parser and grammar files.
- Regenerate the lexer using ANTLR and compare it with this file to confirm the accuracy of all changes, especially the
_serializedATN
.- Update any relevant documentation to reflect the new language feature (if 'extends' indeed introduces inheritance or extension capabilities).
Consider adding a comment at the top of the file explaining the new 'extends' keyword and its implications for the language's capabilities. This will help future maintainers understand the purpose of these changes quickly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- antlr/YorkieSchema.g4 (1 hunks)
- antlr/YorkieSchema.interp (3 hunks)
- antlr/YorkieSchema.tokens (2 hunks)
- antlr/YorkieSchemaLexer.interp (4 hunks)
- antlr/YorkieSchemaLexer.tokens (2 hunks)
- antlr/YorkieSchemaLexer.ts (4 hunks)
- antlr/YorkieSchemaParser.ts (23 hunks)
- src/main.ts (1 hunks)
- src/validator.ts (4 hunks)
- test/schema.test.ts (18 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (35)
antlr/YorkieSchema.tokens (3)
31-38
: Token numbering updated correctly.The token numbers for Identifier, StringLiteral, NumberLiteral, BooleanLiteral, SingleLineComment, MultiLineComment, and WS have been consistently incremented by 1. This change aligns with the addition of new tokens and maintains the integrity of the token numbering system.
48-55
: New 'Array' token added and subsequent tokens renumbered.The addition of the 'Array' token (line 48) enhances the grammar's capability to handle array types. The subsequent tokens ('number', 'string', 'boolean', 'any', 'void', 'null', 'undefined') have been correctly renumbered to accommodate this new addition. This change aligns with the PR objectives of improving type handling.
56-69
: Tokens renumbered consistently, new 'extends' token added.The token numbers for various symbols and Yorkie-specific types have been correctly incremented. The addition of the 'extends' token (line 69) suggests an enhancement in handling type inheritance or extension.
Could you please clarify the purpose of the new 'extends' token? This addition wasn't explicitly mentioned in the PR objectives or summary. To verify its usage, we can run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Tokens renumbered consistently, new 'extends' token usage verified.
The addition of the
extends
token is used within thetypeParameter
rule to support type inheritance, aligning with standard grammar practices. No issues were found with its implementation.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of 'extends' keyword in the grammar files rg --type-add 'grammar:*.g4' --type grammar -i '\bextends\b' -C 3Length of output: 298
antlr/YorkieSchemaLexer.tokens (3)
32-38
: LGTM: Consistent renumbering of tokens.The renumbering of tokens from Identifier to WS is consistent with the addition of the new T__30 token. Each token has been incremented by 1, maintaining the correct order and avoiding conflicts.
31-31
: LGTM: New token T__30 added.The addition of T__30 is consistent with the existing token numbering pattern. This suggests an expansion of the grammar, possibly to support new language features.
To ensure this change is properly integrated, please verify the usage of T__30 in the corresponding grammar file:
48-69
: Significant changes to token string representations - ensure comprehensive testing.The changes to token string representations, including the addition of 'Array'=10 and the reordering of subsequent tokens, suggest a substantial restructuring of the grammar. While these changes appear to be intentional and consistent, they may have far-reaching effects:
- The prominence of 'Array' as the first token might indicate a new emphasis on array types in the language.
- The reordering and reassignment of tokens could impact existing parsers or tools that rely on these token definitions.
To ensure these changes don't introduce regressions:
- Update and run all existing parser tests.
- Verify that all tools and systems depending on this grammar are updated and tested with the new token assignments.
- Run the following script to check for any inconsistencies in token usage:
✅ Verification successful
Token changes verified successfully.
All tokens in
antlr/YorkieSchemaLexer.tokens
are consistently used withinantlr/YorkieSchema.g4
, and no inconsistencies were found. The reordering and reassignment of tokens do not appear to introduce any issues.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistencies in token usage across the codebase. # Test: Compare token usage in .g4 files with the .tokens file. Expect: No mismatches. tokens=$(cat antlr/YorkieSchemaLexer.tokens | grep "'" | cut -d"'" -f2) for token in $tokens; do echo "Checking usage of token: $token" rg --type-add 'antlr:*.g4' --type antlr "$token" antlr/ doneLength of output: 15952
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistencies in token usage across the codebase with proper escaping. # Function to escape special regex characters escape_regex() { echo "$1" | sed 's/[][(){}?|&<>.,]/\\&/g' } # Extract tokens from the .tokens file tokens=$(grep "'" antlr/YorkieSchemaLexer.tokens | cut -d"'" -f2) # Iterate over each token and search its usage in .g4 files for token in $tokens; do # Escape token if it contains special regex characters escaped_token=$(escape_regex "$token") echo "Checking usage of token: $token" rg --type-add 'antlr:*.g4' --type antlr "$escaped_token" antlr/ doneLength of output: 17180
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistencies in token usage across the codebase using fixed-string search. # Extract tokens from the .tokens file tokens=$(grep "'" antlr/YorkieSchemaLexer.tokens | cut -d"'" -f2) # Iterate over each token and search its usage in .g4 files using fixed-string search for token in $tokens; do echo "Checking usage of token: $token" rg -F --type-add 'antlr:*.g4' --type antlr "$token" antlr/ doneLength of output: 14745
src/main.ts (2)
8-8
: LGTM: Linter function updated to use newvalidate
function.The change correctly implements the new validation approach, using
validate(code).errors
instead oftoDiagnostics(code)
.To ensure the structure of error objects returned by
validate
is compatible with the existing mapping logic, please run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the structure of error objects returned by 'validate' # Test: Search for the 'validate' function definition. Expect: Function returning an object with an 'errors' property. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'function validate($_) { $$$ return { errors: $_ }; $$$ }'
4-4
: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The change from
toDiagnostics
tovalidate
aligns with the PR objectives of consolidating validation into a single function.To ensure this change doesn't affect other parts of the codebase, please run the following script:
test/schema.test.ts (12)
17-17
: LGTM: Updated assertion aligns with newvalidate
function behavior.The change from a boolean check to verifying the length of the
errors
array is correct and consistent with the PR's objective.
26-26
: LGTM: Consistent update to assertion.The assertion has been correctly updated to check the length of the
errors
array, maintaining consistency with the newvalidate
function behavior.
36-36
: LGTM: Consistent assertion update.The assertion has been correctly modified to check the
errors
array length, maintaining consistency across the test suite.
45-45
: LGTM: Appropriate update for invalid syntax test.The assertion has been correctly updated to check for the presence of errors in the invalid syntax scenario. Using
toBeGreaterThan(0)
is a good choice as it allows for multiple errors to be reported if necessary.
54-54
: LGTM: Consistent update for invalid syntax test.The assertion has been appropriately modified to check for the presence of errors in the invalid syntax scenario, maintaining consistency with previous changes.
66-66
: LGTM: Appropriate update for valid schema test.The assertion has been correctly modified to check for the absence of errors in a valid schema scenario, aligning with the new
validate
function behavior.
98-98
: LGTM: Consistent update for schema with comments test.The assertion has been appropriately modified to check for the absence of errors in a valid schema with comments, maintaining consistency with the new
validate
function behavior.
125-125
: LGTM: Consistent update for Yorkie Types test.The assertion has been appropriately modified to check for the absence of errors in a valid schema with Yorkie Types, aligning with the new
validate
function behavior.
135-135
: LGTM: Appropriate update for Yorkie types with user-defined attributes test.The assertion has been correctly modified to check for the absence of errors in a valid schema with Yorkie types and user-defined attributes, maintaining consistency with the new
validate
function behavior.
109-114
: Consider the implications of usingany
type andundefined
field.While the assertion update is correct, the changes to the schema definition raise some concerns:
- The use of
any
type reduces type safety. Consider using more specific types if possible.- Adding an
undefined
field might lead to unexpected behavior. Ensure this aligns with the intended schema design.These changes might impact type checking and runtime behavior. Please verify if these modifications are necessary and align with the project's type safety goals.
To ensure these changes don't introduce unintended consequences, please run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any new type-related warnings or errors in the codebase npm run type-check
Line range hint
145-260
: LGTM: Consistent updates to assertions, but skipped tests need attention.The assertions have been appropriately updated to check the
errors
array length, maintaining consistency with the newvalidate
function behavior.However, there are still skipped tests:
- Line 239: "should restrict unused type definition"
- Line 248: "should detect type cycle"
These skipped tests might indicate incomplete implementation or known issues not addressed in this PR. Could you please provide more information about these skipped tests? Are they planned to be implemented in a future PR, or is there a specific reason they remain skipped?
To get more context on the skipped tests, please run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # List all skipped tests in the file grep -n "it.skip" test/schema.test.ts
77-88
: LGTM: Consistent updates and important test activation.The assertion for optional properties has been correctly updated. More importantly, the test for unsupported types has been activated and properly updated. This change is crucial as it aligns with the PR's objective of enhancing error handling for undefined type references.
To ensure the new test is working as expected, please run the following command:
antlr/YorkieSchemaLexer.ts (4)
72-73
: LGTM: Rule names updated correctly.The
ruleNames
array has been properly updated to include "T__30", maintaining consistency with the new token addition.
Line range hint
79-91
: LGTM: Literal and symbolic names updated correctly.The
_LITERAL_NAMES
array has been updated to include the new literal 'extends', and the_SYMBOLIC_NAMES
array has been adjusted to accommodate the new token. This suggests that 'extends' is now a keyword in the grammar, possibly indicating the introduction of inheritance or extension capabilities.Let's verify the usage of 'extends' in the grammar file:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the usage of 'extends' in the grammar file # Expected: 'extends' should be present as a rule or token in the grammar file rg --type antlr "'extends'" antlr/YorkieSchema.g4
124-261
: Verify ATN serialization through ANTLR regeneration.The
_serializedATN
string has been significantly modified, which is expected due to the addition of the new token and the 'extends' keyword. However, manually verifying the correctness of this serialized ATN is impractical and error-prone.To ensure the correctness of these changes:
- Regenerate the lexer using ANTLR with the updated grammar file.
- Compare the regenerated lexer file with this one to confirm that the changes match.
You can use the following command to regenerate the lexer (adjust paths as necessary):
#!/bin/bash # Description: Regenerate the lexer using ANTLR # Note: This command assumes ANTLR is installed and available in the PATH antlr4ts -o generated antlr/YorkieSchema.g4 diff antlr/YorkieSchemaLexer.ts generated/YorkieSchemaLexer.tsIf there are no differences in the output, it confirms that the current changes are correct.
49-56
: LGTM: New token added and indices updated correctly.The addition of the new token
T__30
and the subsequent shift in token indices forIdentifier
,StringLiteral
,NumberLiteral
,BooleanLiteral
,SingleLineComment
,MultiLineComment
, andWS
are implemented correctly. This change likely corresponds to a grammar rule modification.To ensure consistency, let's verify that this new token is used in the parser:
antlr/YorkieSchema.interp (3)
Line range hint
12-19
: Addition of new token literals for primitive typesThe inclusion of new token literals such as
'Array'
,'number'
,'string'
,'boolean'
,'any'
,'void'
,'null'
, and'undefined'
is appropriate. This update enhances the grammar to support these primitive types, which is necessary for improved type handling in the schema.
Line range hint
74-81
: Addition of new token symbolic namesThe addition of symbolic names like
Identifier
,StringLiteral
,NumberLiteral
,BooleanLiteral
,SingleLineComment
,MultiLineComment
, andWS
enhances the parser's ability to recognize and process different token types effectively. This aligns with the updates made to the grammar.
Line range hint
109-199
: Updated ATN transitions reflect grammar enhancementsThe extensive modifications in the ATN transitions indicate significant updates to the grammar to accommodate the new tokens and rules. This is expected given the additions of new primitive types and token definitions. Ensure that all generated parser and lexer files are up-to-date to maintain consistency across the codebase.
antlr/YorkieSchemaLexer.interp (5)
12-12
: Addition of 'Array' to Token Literal NamesThe inclusion of
'Array'
in the token literal names extends the lexer's capability to recognize array type declarations. This change aligns with the introduction of thearrayType
rule and is necessary for proper parsing of array types.
Line range hint
74-81
: New Symbolic Names AddedThe addition of the symbolic names
Identifier
,StringLiteral
,NumberLiteral
,BooleanLiteral
,SingleLineComment
,MultiLineComment
, andWS
enhances the lexer's ability to tokenize identifiers, literals, comments, and whitespace effectively. This improvement supports a more comprehensive parsing process.
131-131
: Significant Updates to the ATN StructureThe changes to the ATN (Abstract Syntax Notation) reflect substantial modifications in the lexer's parsing logic to accommodate new tokens and rules. While these updates are expected due to the introduced enhancements, it's crucial to ensure they don't introduce regressions or unintended parsing behaviors.
Consider regenerating the lexer and parser and executing the full test suite to validate that the changes function as intended.
Line range hint
74-81
: Ensure Consistency in Token Definitions and UsageWith the addition of new tokens and symbolic names, it's essential to maintain consistency across token definitions, symbolic names, and rule names to prevent any parsing inconsistencies or conflicts.
Run the following script to verify the consistency of token assignments:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the token definitions, symbolic names, and rule names are consistent. # Extract token literal names, symbolic names, and rule names from the lexer interpretation file. grep -E 'token literal names:|token symbolic names:|rule names:' antlr/YorkieSchemaLexer.interp -A 50 # Ensure that each token literal name and symbolic name has a corresponding rule name.If inconsistencies are found, adjust the token definitions or rule names accordingly to maintain synchronization.
Also applies to: 114-114
114-114
: Introduction ofT__30
in Rule NamesThe addition of
T__30
indicates a new token has been defined in the lexer. Ensure that this token corresponds correctly to the new'Array'
literal added to the token literal names and is appropriately handled in the parser.To confirm the definition and usage of
T__30
, run the following script:antlr/YorkieSchemaParser.ts (3)
460-512
: Refactored Control Flow inarrayType
Method Enhances ReadabilityThe modification of the
arrayType
method to use aswitch
statement improves clarity and aligns the parsing logic more closely with the grammar definitions. This refactoring enhances maintainability and reduces the potential for errors associated with complex loop conditions.
1105-1107
: Verify Token Offset Calculations inliteral
MethodIn the
literal
method, the token range check uses an offset calculation:if (!(((((_la - 33)) & ~0x1F) === 0 && ((1 << (_la - 33)) & ...) !== 0))) { this._errHandler.recoverInline(this); }Please verify that the offset and bitmask calculations correctly correspond to the intended token range. Incorrect calculations can lead to improper token recognition or parsing errors.
61-68
: Ensure Token Constants Are Updated ConsistentlyThe addition of
public static readonly T__30 = 31;
and the renumbering of subsequent token constants require thorough verification. Please ensure that all references to these token constants throughout the codebase are updated to match the new values. This will prevent potential parsing errors due to mismatched token identifiers.To assist with this verification, you can run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Token Constants Are Consistently Updated
All references to the updated token constants in
YorkieSchemaParser.ts
andYorkieSchemaLexer.ts
have been verified and are consistent with the new values. No mismatches or hardcoded old values were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all references to updated token constants are consistent. # Expected: No occurrences of old token constants or hardcoded old values. # Search for old token constant assignments. rg --type typescript 'public static readonly (Identifier|StringLiteral|NumberLiteral|BooleanLiteral|SingleLineComment|MultiLineComment|WS)\s*=\s*(31|32|33|34|35|36|37);' # Search for usages of old token constants. rg --type typescript 'YorkieSchemaParser\.(Identifier|StringLiteral|NumberLiteral|BooleanLiteral|SingleLineComment|MultiLineComment|WS)\b' # Search for hardcoded old token values. rg --type typescript '\b(31|32|33|34|35|36|37)\b' --context 2Length of output: 481
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all references to updated token constants are consistent by searching TypeScript files explicitly. # Expected: No occurrences of old token constants or hardcoded old values. # Search for old token constant assignments. rg -g '*.ts' 'public static readonly (Identifier|StringLiteral|NumberLiteral|BooleanLiteral|SingleLineComment|MultiLineComment|WS)\s*=\s*(31|32|33|34|35|36|37);' # Search for usages of old token constants. rg -g '*.ts' 'YorkieSchemaParser\.(Identifier|StringLiteral|NumberLiteral|BooleanLiteral|SingleLineComment|MultiLineComment|WS)\b' # Search for hardcoded old token values. rg -g '*.ts' '\b(31|32|33|34|35|36|37)\b' --context 2Length of output: 7388
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ intersectionType | |||
|
|||
arrayType | |||
: primaryType ('[' ']')* | |||
| 'Array' typeArguments |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Action Required: Update Parser, Validator, and Documentation
The addition of | 'Array' typeArguments
to the arrayType
rule is a positive enhancement. However, the following updates are missing to fully integrate this change:
- Parser and Validator Updates: Ensure that both parser and validator components are modified to handle the new
'Array'
syntax correctly. - Documentation: Update the relevant documentation to reflect the new array type definition, providing clarity for users.
Please address these areas to ensure seamless integration and functionality.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approved: Enhanced array type definition
The addition of | 'Array' typeArguments
to the arrayType
rule is a valuable enhancement. It allows for more flexible and precise array type definitions, similar to TypeScript's syntax for generic arrays.
To ensure this change is fully integrated and doesn't introduce any issues:
- Verify that the parser and validator have been updated to handle this new syntax correctly.
- Check for any existing uses of 'Array' as an identifier in current schemas, as this change could potentially break them.
- Update documentation to reflect this new way of defining array types.
Let's verify the impact of this change:
This script will help us identify potential conflicts and ensure that necessary updates have been made across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential conflicts with the new 'Array' keyword
# Test 1: Search for uses of 'Array' as an identifier
echo "Searching for uses of 'Array' as an identifier:"
rg --type-add 'schema:*.{yorkie,ys}' --type schema -i '\bArray\b' -g '!antlr/'
# Test 2: Check if parser and validator files have been updated
echo "Checking for updates in parser and validator files:"
git diff origin/main -- '**/parser*.{ts,js}' '**/validator*.{ts,js}'
# Test 3: Check for documentation updates
echo "Checking for documentation updates:"
git diff origin/main -- '**/*.md'
Length of output: 641
const semanticErrors: Array<Diagnostic> = listener.errors.map((error) => { | ||
return { | ||
severity: 'error', | ||
message: error.message, | ||
range: { | ||
start: { column: error.column, line: error.line }, | ||
end: { column: error.column + 1, line: error.line }, | ||
}, | ||
}; | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ensure error ranges cover the full length of identifiers
Currently, the error range in diagnostics only covers a single character (error.column + 1
), which may not encompass multi-character identifiers. For more accurate error highlighting, adjust the range to include the full length of the undefined identifier.
Update the code to include the length of the identifier when collecting errors and adjust the error range accordingly:
- Modify
enterTypeReference
to capture the identifier's length:
enterTypeReference(ctx: TypeReferenceContext) {
const typeName = ctx.Identifier().text;
const { line, charPositionInLine, startIndex, stopIndex } = ctx.Identifier().symbol;
+ const length = stopIndex - startIndex + 1;
this.typeReferences.push({
typeName: typeName,
line: line,
column: charPositionInLine,
+ length: length,
});
}
- Include
length
when pushing errors in the validation logic:
listener.typeReferences.forEach((ref) => {
if (!listener.symbolTable.has(ref.typeName)) {
listener.errors.push({
message: `Type '${ref.typeName}' is not defined.`,
line: ref.line,
column: ref.column,
+ length: ref.length,
});
}
});
- Adjust the error range in the diagnostic mapping:
const semanticErrors: Array<Diagnostic> = listener.errors.map((error) => {
return {
severity: 'error',
message: error.message,
range: {
start: { column: error.column, line: error.line },
- end: { column: error.column + 1, line: error.line },
+ end: { column: error.column + error.length, line: error.line },
},
};
});
By implementing these changes, the diagnostics will accurately highlight the entire undefined identifier, improving the developer experience during debugging.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
const diagnostics: Array<Diagnostic> = []; | ||
const tree = parser.document(); | ||
const listener = new TypeCollectorListener(); | ||
ParseTreeWalker.DEFAULT.walk(listener as any, tree); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Avoid casting 'listener' to 'any' in ParseTreeWalker.DEFAULT.walk
Casting listener
to any
bypasses TypeScript's type checking, which can hide potential issues. To maintain type safety, ensure that TypeCollectorListener
correctly implements all necessary interfaces.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
+import { ParseTreeListener } from 'antlr4ts/tree/ParseTreeListener';
-export class TypeCollectorListener implements YorkieSchemaListener {
+export class TypeCollectorListener implements YorkieSchemaListener, ParseTreeListener {
// class implementation
}
-ParseTreeWalker.DEFAULT.walk(listener as any, tree);
+ParseTreeWalker.DEFAULT.walk(listener, tree);
This change ensures that listener
conforms to the expected type without casting, preserving type safety and catching potential errors at compile time.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
public primaryType(): PrimaryTypeContext | undefined { | ||
return this.tryGetRuleContext(0, PrimaryTypeContext); | ||
} | ||
public typeArguments(): TypeArgumentsContext | undefined { | ||
return this.tryGetRuleContext(0, TypeArgumentsContext); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Handle Optional Return Types in ArrayTypeContext
Methods
The methods primaryType()
and typeArguments()
in ArrayTypeContext
now return optional types (PrimaryTypeContext | undefined
and TypeArgumentsContext | undefined
, respectively) using tryGetRuleContext
. Ensure that any code invoking these methods properly handles the possibility of undefined
to prevent runtime errors.
Consider implementing null checks or using optional chaining when accessing the return values of these methods. For example:
const primaryType = arrayTypeContext.primaryType();
if (primaryType) {
// Safe to use primaryType
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your contribution.
screen-capture.webm |
This PR does:
validate
function to behave liketoDiagnostics
andtoDiagnostics
is removed.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
TypeCollectorListener
class for enhanced type validation and error handling.Bug Fixes
Tests