Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Detect duplicate declaration #9

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025
Merged

Detect duplicate declaration #9

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

hackerwins
Copy link
Member

@hackerwins hackerwins commented Jan 17, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it:

Detect duplicate declaration

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Addresses yorkie-team/yorkie#971

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced type validation with improved error handling
    • Added support for detecting duplicate type aliases
    • Introduced comprehensive diagnostic error reporting
  • Tests

    • Added test cases for duplicate type declarations
    • Added test cases for detecting duplicate object keys

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces enhancements to the schema validation mechanism in the Yorkie project. The changes focus on improving error handling and type management within the validator.ts file. A new Diagnostic type is added to capture error messages with severity and location details. The TypeCollectorListener class is refactored to use a symbolMap instead of symbolTable, and new validation logic is implemented to detect and report duplicate type aliases and object property names.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/validator.ts - Added Diagnostic type for error reporting
- Replaced symbolTable with symbolMap
- Introduced enterPropertyName method to handle property name validation
- Enhanced error handling for duplicate type declarations and properties
test/schema.test.ts - Added test cases for duplicate type alias declarations
- Added test cases for duplicate keys in object types

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Schema Validation Device (A) [#971]
Validate Document Changes [#971]
Prevent Duplicate Type Declarations [#971]

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 In the realm of types and schemas bright,
Validation dances with rabbit-like might!
Duplicates flee from our vigilant ear,
Symbols mapped, errors crystal clear.
Code hops forward with magical grace! 🌟

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/validator.ts (3)

41-51: Consider enhancing the Diagnostic type documentation.

The severity levels ('error' | 'warning' | 'info') could benefit from documentation explaining when each level should be used. This would help maintain consistency in error reporting across the codebase.

 /**
  * `Diagnostic` represents a diagnostic message.
+ *
+ * Severity levels:
+ * - error: Used for issues that prevent correct schema validation
+ * - warning: Used for potential issues that don't invalidate the schema
+ * - info: Used for suggestions and best practices
  */
 export type Diagnostic = {

65-71: Enhance duplicate type error message with original declaration location.

Consider storing and including the location of the original declaration in the error message to help users quickly identify and fix duplicate declarations.

 if (this.symbolMap.has(typeName)) {
+  const original = this.symbolMap.get(typeName)!;
   this.errors.push({
-    message: `Duplicate type declaration: ${typeName}`,
+    message: `Duplicate type declaration: ${typeName} (originally declared at line ${original.line}, column ${original.column})`,
     line: line,
     column: charPositionInLine,
   });
 }

Line range hint 194-220: Optimize circular reference detection algorithm.

The current implementation has O(n²) complexity. Consider using a more efficient graph algorithm like Tarjan's strongly connected components algorithm for detecting cycles.

Would you like me to provide an optimized implementation using Tarjan's algorithm?

test/schema.test.ts (1)

101-119: Enhance test coverage with additional edge cases.

Consider adding test cases for:

  1. Nested objects with duplicate properties
  2. Duplicate properties with different case (case sensitivity)
  3. Properties duplicated across inherited types

Example additional test cases:

it('should detect duplicate keys in nested objects', () => {
  const schema = `
    type Document = {
      nested: {
        field: string;
        field: number;
      };
    };
  `;
  expect(validate(schema).errors.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
});

it('should handle case sensitivity in property names', () => {
  const schema = `
    type Document = {
      field: string;
      Field: number;  // Should this be considered a duplicate?
    };
  `;
  expect(validate(schema).errors.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
});
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0a9905d and a2b3dfb.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/validator.ts (4 hunks)
  • test/schema.test.ts (1 hunks)

src/validator.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/validator.ts (2)

22-51: Consider making type properties readonly for immutability.

The new types are well-structured, but making their properties readonly would prevent accidental modifications and improve type safety.

 type TypeSymbol = {
-  name: string;
-  line: number;
-  column: number;
+  readonly name: string;
+  readonly line: number;
+  readonly column: number;
 };

 type TypeReference = {
-  name: string;
-  parent: string;
-  line: number;
-  column: number;
+  readonly name: string;
+  readonly parent: string;
+  readonly line: number;
+  readonly column: number;
 };

 export type Diagnostic = {
-  severity: 'error' | 'warning' | 'info';
-  message: string;
-  range: {
-    start: { column: number; line: number };
-    end: { column: number; line: number };
-  };
+  readonly severity: 'error' | 'warning' | 'info';
+  readonly message: string;
+  readonly range: {
+    readonly start: { readonly column: number; readonly line: number };
+    readonly end: { readonly column: number; readonly line: number };
+  };
 };

Line range hint 185-191: Enhance error message for undefined type references.

The error message could be more descriptive by including the parent type where the reference was used.

     if (!listener.symbolMap.has(ref.name)) {
       listener.errors.push({
-        message: `Type '${ref.name}' is not defined.`,
+        message: `Type '${ref.name}' referenced in '${ref.parent}' is not defined.`,
         line: ref.line,
         column: ref.column,
       });
     }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a2b3dfb and db4b9e0.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/validator.ts (4 hunks)
  • test/schema.test.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • test/schema.test.ts
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/validator.ts (2)

11-14: LGTM!

The addition of PropertyNameContext import is necessary for implementing the duplicate property detection feature.


Line range hint 195-224: Consider optimizing circular reference detection.

The current implementation uses a while loop with Set operations. Consider using a more efficient graph-based algorithm for larger schemas.

Let's check if there are any large schema files in the codebase that might benefit from optimization:

src/validator.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
src/validator.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
@hackerwins hackerwins merged commit 4e5a05d into main Jan 17, 2025
2 checks passed
@hackerwins hackerwins deleted the detect-duplication branch January 17, 2025 08:33
hackerwins added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant