Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add activation flow preference test #17

Closed

Conversation

pablothedude
Copy link
Contributor

@pablothedude pablothedude commented Nov 1, 2024

Add a test tom for the preferred activation flow query params

OpenConext/Stepup-SelfService#336

@pablothedude pablothedude force-pushed the feature/add-activation-flow-preference-test branch 2 times, most recently from 2ae8392 to 9550754 Compare November 4, 2024 09:44
Copy link
Member

@MKodde MKodde Nov 6, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome to cover these vetting nudging flows in the behat tests.

IRL you mentioned that the new feature to express the preference via a entitlement attribute was hard to test in this test suite right? OpenConext/Stepup-SelfService#336. It might be possible to collaborate with Pieter and create a new feature in the SSP SP.php test page. And let the SP notify the demo IdP to release a certain attribute if this is requested in the relay state. Just a wild idea that might be usefull in other situations.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pablothedude pablothedude force-pushed the feature/add-activation-flow-preference-test branch 2 times, most recently from be0acb7 to af5a4cd Compare November 7, 2024 10:25
Add a test tom for the preferred activation flow query params
@pablothedude
Copy link
Contributor Author

These changed are merged with: #22

@pablothedude pablothedude deleted the feature/add-activation-flow-preference-test branch December 5, 2024 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants