feat(backend): ux-datamap, DRD #51
Conversation
This commit adds the necessary code changes to generate a UX Data Map document. The `UXDatamapHandler` class is introduced, which implements the `BuildHandler` interface. It includes a `run` method that generates the UX Data Map document based on the provided context data. The `UXDatamapHandler` class uses the `prompts.generateUXDataMapPrompt` function to dynamically generate the UX Data Map prompt. The prompt includes information such as the project name, sitemap documentation, and platform. The generated UX Data Map document is stored in the context using the `setData` method, with the key `uxDatamapDocument`. This feature enhances the project builder functionality by providing a way to generate a UX Data Map document, which helps in analyzing data requirements from a user experience perspective. Co-authored-by: Jackson Chen <[email protected]>
…base schema This commit adds the necessary code changes to generate the Database Requirements Document and the corresponding database schema. It introduces the `DBRequirementDocumentHandler` class, which implements the `BuildHandler` interface. The `run` method in this class generates the Database Requirements Document based on the provided context data. Additionally, the commit includes the `DBSchemaHandler` class, which is responsible for generating the database schema. It uses the `markdown-to-txt` library to convert the Markdown content of the Database Requirements Document into plain text, which is then used to generate the schema. These features enhance the project builder functionality by providing the ability to generate the Database Requirements Document and the database schema, ensuring a clear understanding of the database structure and requirements. Co-authored-by: Jackson Chen <[email protected]>
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several new files and modifications related to the database requirements and schema for a music web application. A new document outlines the database requirements, detailing key entities and their relationships. Additionally, new classes and methods are added for handling database requirements and schemas, along with corresponding test files to ensure functionality. Changes to existing handlers and prompts reflect updates in the model used for generating documents and improved error handling in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
backend/src/build-system/node/ux-datamap/index.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier". (The package "eslint-plugin-prettier" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "/backend".) It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following: The plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier" was referenced from the config file in "backend/.eslintrc.js". If you still can't figure out the problem, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 22
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (22)
backend/src/build-system/node/ux-datamap/index.ts (2)
3-3: Remove unused importModelProviderThe
ModelProviderimport is not directly used in this file.-import { ModelProvider } from 'src/common/model-provider';
20-22: Address the TODO comment for hardcoded platformThe hardcoded 'web' platform should be made configurable, possibly through the context or args.
Would you like me to help implement a platform configuration system that could be reused across handlers?
backend/src/build-system/node/database-requirements-document/index.ts (2)
4-4: Remove unused importThe
fsmodule is imported but never used in the code. Consider removing it if it's not needed for future implementations.-import * as fs from 'fs';
28-31: Add response validationThe success response should include validation to ensure the data meets expected format requirements.
+ if (!dbRequirementsContent.includes('Database Requirements')) { + this.logger.warn('Generated content might not be a valid database requirements document'); + } return { success: true, data: dbRequirementsContent, + timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), };backend/src/build-system/node/product_requirements_document/prd.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-41: Consider enhancing type safety for the context dataThe
runmethod uses string literals for context data keys which could lead to runtime errors if keys are mistyped.Consider defining an enum or const object for context keys:
export const PRD_CONTEXT_KEYS = { PROJECT_NAME: 'projectName', DESCRIPTION: 'description', PLATFORM: 'platform', } as const;Then use these constants in the code to improve type safety and maintainability.
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-database-schemas.spec.ts (3)
6-8: Enhance mock implementation for better test coverageThe current mock implementation returns a static string 'mock content' which may not provide sufficient test coverage. Consider implementing different mock responses for different test scenarios.
jest.mock('fs', () => ({ - readFileSync: jest.fn(() => 'mock content'), + readFileSync: jest.fn((path) => { + if (path.includes('db-requirement.document.md')) { + return '# Database Requirements\n- Requirement 1\n- Requirement 2'; + } + throw new Error(`Mock not implemented for path: ${path}`); + }), }));
1-1: Consider using relative import pathsThe import path starting with 'src/' might cause issues in different environments. Consider using relative paths for better portability.
-import { BuilderContext } from 'src/build-system/context'; +import { BuilderContext } from '../../context';
36-36: Remove console.log from test codeUsing console.log in test code is not recommended as it clutters test output. Consider using proper assertions instead.
- console.log(result); + expect(result).toBeDefined(); + expect(result).toMatchSnapshot();backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.spec.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-65: Test coverage needs improvement.The test suite has several coverage gaps that should be addressed:
- No tests verifying the behavior of the new 'id' parameter in BuilderContext
- No error cases tested (e.g., invalid id, undefined sequence)
- Missing state management tests (previously removed)
- No validation of parallel execution flag in sequence steps
Consider adding these test cases:
describe('BuilderContext Configuration', () => { test('should properly initialize with id parameter', () => { const context = new BuilderContext(testSequence, 'custom-id'); expect(context.getId()).toBe('custom-id'); }); test('should throw error for invalid id', () => { expect(() => new BuilderContext(testSequence, '')).toThrow(); }); }); describe('Sequence Execution', () => { test('should handle parallel execution flag', async () => { const parallelSequence = { ...testSequence, steps: [{ ...testSequence.steps[0], parallel: true }] }; const context = new BuilderContext(parallelSequence, 'id'); const executor = new BuildSequenceExecutor(context); const result = await executor.execute(); expect(result.success).toBe(true); }); });
Line range hint
1-65: Consider adding integration tests for database requirements.Given this PR's focus on Database Requirements Document (DRD) functionality, this test file should include integration tests between ProjectInitHandler and the new database-related components.
Would you like me to help create integration test cases that verify the interaction between ProjectInitHandler and the new DatabaseRequirementHandler?
backend/src/build-system/node/database-requirements-document/prompt.ts (1)
67-72: Consider adding essential database management sections.The "Additional Considerations" section could be enhanced with:
- Version control strategy for schema changes
- Disaster recovery requirements and RPO/RTO objectives
- Data governance and compliance requirements (GDPR, data retention policies, etc.)
Consider expanding section 8 with:
#### 8. Additional Considerations - Backup requirements - Archive strategy - Data migration needs - Integration requirements +- Version control and schema migration strategy +- Disaster recovery plan and objectives +- Data governance and compliance requirements + - Privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA, etc.) + - Data retention and deletion policies + - Data classification and handlingbackend/src/build-system/context.ts (3)
11-14: Consider strengthening type safety and documentation.While the type definitions improve type safety, consider these enhancements:
- Replace
Record<string, any>with a more specific type to maintain strict type checking- Consider using an enum instead of union type for
GlobalDataKeys- Add JSDoc comments to document the purpose of these types
+/** Keys for global configuration data used across the build system */ -export type GlobalDataKeys = 'projectName' | 'description' | 'platform'; +export enum GlobalDataKeys { + ProjectName = 'projectName', + Description = 'description', + Platform = 'platform', +} +/** Type definition for context data with strict typing */ type ContextData = { - [key in GlobalDataKeys]: string; -} & Record<string, any>; + [key in GlobalDataKeys]: string; + // Add specific additional properties here instead of Record<string, any> };
95-98: LGTM! Consider adding type assertion.The implementation is solid with good error handling. For additional type safety, consider adding a type assertion for the returned value.
getData<Key extends keyof ContextData>(key: Key): ContextData[Key] { if (!(key in this.data)) { throw new Error(`Data key "${key}" is not set or does not exist.`); } - return this.data[key]; + return this.data[key] as ContextData[Key]; }
databaseTypekey is missing fromGlobalDataKeystypeThe
DBSchemaHandlerusesgetData('databaseType'), butdatabaseTypeis not included in theGlobalDataKeystype definition. This can lead to type-safety issues since TypeScript won't catch mismatches between the defined types and actual usage.
- Add
'databaseType'to theGlobalDataKeystype inbackend/src/build-system/context.ts:export type GlobalDataKeys = 'projectName' | 'description' | 'platform' | 'databaseType';🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
11-98: Verify integration with DBSchemaHandler.Since this context is used by the DBSchemaHandler class, let's verify the integration points.
Let me gather more information about the
databaseTypefield since it's being used but wasn't defined in theGlobalDataKeystype.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of BuilderContext in DBSchemaHandler # Find all files that might use BuilderContext with DBSchemaHandler echo "Searching for DBSchemaHandler usage of BuilderContext..." rg -l "DBSchemaHandler.*BuilderContext|BuilderContext.*DBSchemaHandler" --type ts # Find specific getData/setData usage in schema handlers echo "Checking getData/setData usage in schema handlers..." rg "getData|setData" --type ts -C 3 backend/src/build-system/node/database-schemas/Length of output: 1194
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the definition of databaseType in the codebase echo "Searching for databaseType type definitions..." rg "databaseType.*type|type.*databaseType" --type ts -C 3 # Look for where databaseType is being set echo "Checking where databaseType is being set..." ast-grep --pattern 'setData($_, "databaseType")' # Check if there are any other consumers of databaseType echo "Finding other consumers of databaseType..." rg "getData\(['\"]databaseType" --type ts -C 2Length of output: 1635
backend/src/build-system/node/ux-datamap/prompt.ts (3)
1-6: Add parameter validation and JSDoc documentation.Consider adding input validation and comprehensive documentation for better maintainability and type safety.
export const prompts = { + /** + * Generates a UX Data Map prompt for analyzing sitemap documentation + * @param projectName - The name of the project being analyzed + * @param sitemapDoc - The sitemap documentation to analyze + * @param platform - The target platform (e.g., web, mobile, desktop) + * @returns A formatted prompt string for UX analysis + * @throws {Error} If any required parameters are empty or invalid + */ generateUXDataMapPrompt: ( projectName: string, sitemapDoc: string, platform: string, ): string => { + if (!projectName?.trim()) throw new Error('Project name is required'); + if (!sitemapDoc?.trim()) throw new Error('Sitemap documentation is required'); + if (!platform?.trim()) throw new Error('Platform is required');
87-129: Enhance login example with modern authentication considerations.The login page example should include modern authentication features and comprehensive error handling.
**Required Data Elements**: *Input Data*: - Username/Email - Purpose: Identify the user account - User expectation: Email format or username rules - Should be remembered if user chooses - Password - Purpose: Authenticate the user - Should be masked for security - Should support paste functionality - "Remember Me" option - Purpose: Convenience for returning users - Optional selection + - Two-Factor Authentication + - Purpose: Enhanced security + - Optional based on user preference + - Support for various 2FA methods *Display Data*: - Login form status - Authentication feedback - Password requirements (if needed) - Account recovery options + - Brute force protection status + - Session timeout information + - Device trust status *Feedback & States*: - Loading state during authentication - Success feedback and redirect - Error messages for invalid credentials - Password recovery confirmation + - Account lockout notifications + - Suspicious activity alerts + - 2FA verification states
132-138: Enhance output format specifications.The output format instructions could be more specific about the expected structure and include validation rules.
-Your reply must start with: "```UXDataMap" and end with "```". +Your reply must: +1. Start with: "```UXDataMap" +2. Include a version identifier: "Version: 1.0" +3. Follow the exact heading structure defined above +4. End with: "```" + +Ensure each section: +1. Uses consistent markdown formatting +2. Includes all required subsections +3. Follows naming conventions Focus on describing the data requirements from a user experience perspective. For each page: 1. What data needs to be collected and why 2. What information needs to be displayed and why 3. How the data supports user goals -4. What feedback the user needs`; +4. What feedback the user needs +5. How the data flow impacts user experience +6. What success metrics should be tracked`;backend/src/build-system/__tests__/db-requirement-document.md (2)
98-99: Improve scalability and personalization capabilitiesTwo critical architectural concerns:
PlaybackState's queue implementation:
- Storing an array of
song_idsin a single field might hit database size limits- Consider creating a separate
PlaybackQueuetable for better scalabilityRecommendation entity needs more attributes for effective personalization:
recommendation_type: (e.g., genre-based, listening-history-based)confidence_score: For recommendation quality trackingcontext: To store the reasoning behind recommendationsWould you like me to provide a detailed design for these improvements?
Also applies to: 105-110
189-196: Enhance query performance optimization strategyThe current indexing strategy needs enhancement:
Add specific partition strategies:
- Consider time-based partitioning for PlaybackState
- Implement horizontal partitioning for Songs by genre
Add composite indexes for common queries:
- (user_id, created_at) for user activity history
- (genre, release_date) for genre-based recommendations
Would you like me to provide a detailed indexing and partitioning strategy?
backend/src/build-system/node/database-schemas/schemas.ts (2)
9-9: Logger instance is defined but not usedThe
loggerinstance is declared but not utilized within the class. Consider removing it if it's unnecessary or use it to log important events or errors to enhance debugging and monitoring.Apply this diff to remove the unused logger:
import { Logger } from '@nestjs/common'; -export class DBSchemaHandler implements BuildHandler { - readonly id = 'OP:DATABASE:SCHEMAS'; - readonly logger = new Logger('DBSchemaHandler'); async run(context: BuilderContext, args: unknown): Promise<BuildResult> {
26-26: Make the model name configurableHardcoding the model name
'gpt-4o-mini'reduces flexibility. Consider retrieving the model name from the context or configuration to allow easy updates and variations.Apply this diff to make the model name configurable:
+ const modelName = context.getData('modelName') || 'gpt-4o-mini'; dbAnalysis = await context.model.chatSync( { content: analysisPrompt, }, - 'gpt-4o-mini', + modelName, ); schemaContent = await context.model.chatSync( { content: schemaPrompt, }, - 'gpt-4o-mini', + modelName, );Also applies to: 38-38
backend/src/build-system/node/database-schemas/prompt.ts (1)
14-57: Refactor to Reduce Code DuplicationThe example output formats and generation rules in both
analyzeDatabaseRequirementsandgenerateDatabaseSchemaare similar. This duplication can make maintenance harder and increase the risk of inconsistencies.Suggestion:
Extract the common sections, such as the example output formats and generation rules, into shared constants or helper functions. This will improve maintainability and ensure consistency across both methods.
Also applies to: 69-119
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/db-requirement-document.md(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-database-schemas.spec.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.spec.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/context.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/node/database-requirements-document/index.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/node/database-requirements-document/prompt.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/node/database-schemas/prompt.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/node/database-schemas/schemas.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/node/product_requirements_document/prd.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/node/ux-datamap/index.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/node/ux-datamap/prompt.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/common/model-provider/index.ts(8 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/db-requirement-document.md
[uncategorized] ~60-~60: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...io -profile_image -created_at, updated_at` - Relationships: - O...
(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
[uncategorized] ~101-~101: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... (Seconds) - volume - created_at, updated_at ##### Recommendation - *...
(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
[style] ~179-~179: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ction table: playlist_song). - Song to Album: Many-to-one. - Song to `Arti...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~180-~180: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...SongtoAlbum: Many-to-one. - SongtoArtist: Many-to-one. - UsertoPla...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
[style] ~181-~181: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ongtoArtist: Many-to-one. - UsertoPlaybackState`: One-to-one. - Referent...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🪛 Biome
backend/src/common/model-provider/index.ts
[error] 259-259: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
backend/src/build-system/node/ux-datamap/index.ts (1)
13-15: Consider stricter default values or validation
The default values for projectName and uxGoals might not be suitable for production use.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how other handlers handle missing context data
# Search for patterns of getData with default values
rg -A 2 "context\.getData\([^)]+\)\s*\|\|" backend/src/build-system/node/database-requirements-document/index.ts (2)
9-11: LGTM! Well-structured class declaration
The class follows good practices with:
- Clear interface implementation
- Meaningful operation identifier
- Proper logging setup
9-9: Verify BuildHandler interface implementation
Let's ensure all required methods of the BuildHandler interface are implemented.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the implementation to verify if all required methods are present.
BuildHandler interface is correctly implemented ✅
The DatabaseRequirementHandler class properly implements all required members of the BuildHandler interface:
idproperty is defined as a readonly stringrun()method is implemented with the correct signature:run(context: BuilderContext, args: unknown): Promise<BuildResult>
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for BuildHandler interface definition and compare with implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'interface BuildHandler {
$$$
}'
# Search for other implementations to understand required methods
ast-grep --pattern 'implements BuildHandler {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 869
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the DatabaseRequirementHandler implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class DatabaseRequirementHandler implements BuildHandler {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2691
backend/src/build-system/node/product_requirements_document/prd.ts (1)
37-37: Verify the model name 'gpt-4o-mini'
The model name appears to be non-standard. Is this a typo for 'gpt-4' or a custom model? Please verify the correct model name to ensure API compatibility.
Let's check for other model name usages in the codebase:
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-database-schemas.spec.ts (1)
30-33: Verify file path security
The file path used in readFileSync could potentially lead to path traversal vulnerabilities. Ensure the path is properly sanitized and restricted to the intended directory.
backend/src/common/model-provider/index.ts (12)
44-70: LGTM: Enhanced chatSync method with proper error handling and cleanup
The updated implementation of chatSync improves logging, error handling, and ensures that resources are properly cleaned up. This enhances the robustness and maintainability of the method.
72-79: LGTM: Properly resetting state in resetState method
The resetState method correctly resets internal state variables and unsubscribes from any existing subscriptions, ensuring a clean state before starting new operations.
91-95: LGTM: Added error handling for missing model selection
Adding an explicit check for a selected model improves error handling in the chat method, preventing potential issues when no model is provided.
111-111: LGTM: Normalizing chat input
The normalizeChatInput method correctly handles both string and ChatInput types, ensuring consistent input processing.
114-118: LGTM: Handling next chunk in async iterator
The handleNext method properly manages the asynchronous iteration of chat chunks, correctly resolving promises based on the state of the chunk queue.
140-147: LGTM: Clean up resources in cleanup method
The cleanup method effectively resets state variables and unsubscribes from the response subscription, preventing potential memory leaks and ensuring the provider is ready for new operations.
Line range hint 193-213: LGTM: Proper handling of stream end in handleStreamEnd
The handleStreamEnd method correctly finalizes the stream, sends the done chunk, and sets the done state, ensuring the iterator completes as expected.
217-235: LGTM: Improved error handling in handleStreamError
The handleStreamError method appropriately handles streaming errors by logging the error, resolving pending promises, and ensuring the provider's state is correctly updated.
293-304: LGTM: Validating chunks with proper logging
The isValidChunk method effectively checks the structure of incoming chunks and logs warnings for any invalid data, enhancing data integrity.
309-313: LGTM: Fetching model names with error handling
The fetchModelsName method correctly retrieves model tags and includes appropriate logging and error handling, ensuring reliable operation.
321-335: LGTM: Addition of StreamStatus enum and ChatCompletionChunk class
Introducing the StreamStatus enum and ChatCompletionChunk class improves code clarity and type safety for stream handling.
337-346: LGTM: Redefinition of ChatInput interface
The redefinition of the ChatInput interface to include optional properties provides greater flexibility and accommodates a wider range of input scenarios.
|
|
||
| const prompt = prompts.generateUXDataMapPrompt( | ||
| projectName, | ||
| args as string, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add type validation for args parameter
Direct type casting of args to string without validation could lead to runtime errors.
- args as string,
+ typeof args === 'string' ? args : JSON.stringify(args),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| args as string, | |
| typeof args === 'string' ? args : JSON.stringify(args), |
| const uxDatamapContent = await context.model.chatSync( | ||
| { | ||
| content: prompt, | ||
| }, | ||
| 'gpt-4o-mini', | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for model interactions
The chatSync call lacks error handling and response validation.
- const uxDatamapContent = await context.model.chatSync(
- {
- content: prompt,
- },
- 'gpt-4o-mini',
- );
+ try {
+ const uxDatamapContent = await context.model.chatSync(
+ {
+ content: prompt,
+ },
+ 'gpt-4o-mini',
+ );
+
+ if (!uxDatamapContent || typeof uxDatamapContent !== 'string') {
+ throw new Error('Invalid response from model');
+ }
+
+ return {
+ success: true,
+ data: uxDatamapContent,
+ };
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to generate UX Data Map:', error);
+ return {
+ success: false,
+ error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error occurred',
+ };
+ }
-
- return {
- success: true,
- data: uxDatamapContent,
- };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const uxDatamapContent = await context.model.chatSync( | |
| { | |
| content: prompt, | |
| }, | |
| 'gpt-4o-mini', | |
| ); | |
| try { | |
| const uxDatamapContent = await context.model.chatSync( | |
| { | |
| content: prompt, | |
| }, | |
| 'gpt-4o-mini', | |
| ); | |
| if (!uxDatamapContent || typeof uxDatamapContent !== 'string') { | |
| throw new Error('Invalid response from model'); | |
| } | |
| return { | |
| success: true, | |
| data: uxDatamapContent, | |
| }; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Failed to generate UX Data Map:', error); | |
| return { | |
| success: false, | |
| error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error occurred', | |
| }; | |
| } |
| import { prompts } from './prompt'; | ||
|
|
||
| export class UXDatamapHandler implements BuildHandler { | ||
| readonly id = 'op:UX_DATAMAP::STATE:GENERATE'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Handler ID format needs standardization
The handler ID format is inconsistent across the codebase:
- Most handlers follow the pattern
op:<OPERATION>::STATE:<STATE>:'op:DATABASE_REQ::STATE:GENERATE''op:PROJECT::STATE:SETUP''op:UX_DATAMAP::STATE:GENERATE''op:PRD::STATE:GENERATE'
- But one handler uses a different format:
'OP:DATABASE:SCHEMAS'
The ID in UXDatamapHandler follows the majority convention, but the codebase would benefit from standardizing all handler IDs to follow the same format.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the handler ID format convention
The handler ID 'op:UX_DATAMAP::STATE:GENERATE' appears to follow a specific format. Let's verify this convention across other handlers.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the format of handler IDs across the codebase
# Expected format: op:<OPERATION>::STATE:<STATE>
# Search for other handler implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements BuildHandler {
readonly id = $_;
}'
Length of output: 1948
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find handler IDs using ripgrep
rg -B 2 -A 2 'readonly\s+id\s*=' --type typescript
Length of output: 87
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler approach to find handler IDs
rg -B 2 -A 2 'readonly\s+id\s*='
Length of output: 2459
| args as string, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add type validation for args parameter
The type assertion args as string is unsafe. Consider adding proper type validation before the assertion.
- args as string,
+ typeof args === 'string' ? args : JSON.stringify(args),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| args as string, | |
| ); | |
| typeof args === 'string' ? args : JSON.stringify(args), | |
| ); |
| const dbRequirementsContent = await model.chatSync( | ||
| { | ||
| content: prompt, | ||
| }, | ||
| 'gpt-4o-mini', | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling and configuration management
Several improvements needed:
- Add try-catch block for model.chatSync
- Move the model identifier to configuration
- Validate the model response structure
+ const MODEL_ID = process.env.DB_REQ_MODEL_ID || 'gpt-4o-mini';
+ try {
const dbRequirementsContent = await model.chatSync(
{
content: prompt,
},
- 'gpt-4o-mini',
+ MODEL_ID,
);
+ if (!dbRequirementsContent || typeof dbRequirementsContent !== 'string') {
+ throw new Error('Invalid model response format');
+ }
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error(`Failed to generate database requirements: ${error.message}`);
+ return {
+ success: false,
+ error: 'Failed to generate database requirements',
+ };
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| const dbAnalysis = await context.model.chatSync( | ||
| { | ||
| content: analysisPrompt, | ||
| }, | ||
| 'gpt-4o-mini', | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for 'chatSync' calls
The chatSync method may throw exceptions if the model call fails. Wrap these calls in try...catch blocks to handle potential errors gracefully.
Apply this diff to add error handling:
+ let dbAnalysis: string;
try {
dbAnalysis = await context.model.chatSync(
{
content: analysisPrompt,
},
'gpt-4o-mini',
);
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error('Error during database analysis:', error);
+ return { success: false, data: null };
+ }
+ let schemaContent: string;
try {
schemaContent = await context.model.chatSync(
{
content: schemaPrompt,
},
'gpt-4o-mini',
);
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error('Error during schema generation:', error);
+ return { success: false, data: null };
+ }Also applies to: 34-39
| const analysisPrompt = prompts.analyzeDatabaseRequirements( | ||
| projectName, | ||
| args as string, | ||
| databaseType, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure 'args' is a string before casting
Casting args to string without a type check might lead to runtime errors if args is not a string. Add a type guard to validate args before using it.
Apply this diff to improve type safety:
const analysisPrompt = prompts.analyzeDatabaseRequirements(
projectName,
- args as string,
+ typeof args === 'string' ? args : '',
databaseType,
);Alternatively, adjust the method signature to expect a string:
-async run(context: BuilderContext, args: unknown): Promise<BuildResult> {
+async run(context: BuilderContext, args: string): Promise<BuildResult> {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const analysisPrompt = prompts.analyzeDatabaseRequirements( | |
| projectName, | |
| args as string, | |
| databaseType, | |
| ); | |
| const analysisPrompt = prompts.analyzeDatabaseRequirements( | |
| projectName, | |
| typeof args === 'string' ? args : '', | |
| databaseType, | |
| ); |
| return `You are a Database Architect specializing in ${databaseType}. Your task is to analyze the provided database requirements document and create a clear plan for schema generation. Use the following requirements as input: | ||
|
|
||
| ${dbRequirements} | ||
|
|
||
| Generate a structured analysis describing what needs to be created for each database entity. Your reply must start with "\`\`\`DBAnalysis" and end with "\`\`\`". | ||
|
|
||
| For each entity in the requirements: | ||
| 1. What tables/collections need to be created | ||
| 2. What indexes are necessary | ||
| 3. What constraints must be enforced | ||
| 4. What relationships need to be established | ||
|
|
||
| Example output format: | ||
|
|
||
| \`\`\`DBAnalysis | ||
| Database: ${projectName} | ||
| Type: ${databaseType} | ||
|
|
||
| Entity: Users | ||
| - Primary table for user accounts | ||
| - Required fields: id, email, username, password_hash, subscription_type | ||
| - Unique constraints on email and username | ||
| - Indexes needed on email and username for quick lookup | ||
| - JSON/JSONB field for preferences | ||
| - Timestamps for created_at and updated_at | ||
|
|
||
| Entity: Playlists | ||
| - Primary table for playlist management | ||
| - Required fields: id, title, user_id, is_system_generated | ||
| - Foreign key relationship to Users | ||
| - Index on user_id for quick user playlist lookup | ||
| - Composite index on (user_id, title) for unique user playlists | ||
|
|
||
| [Continue for all entities...] | ||
|
|
||
| Required Junction Tables: | ||
| 1. playlist_songs | ||
| - Manages N:M relationship between playlists and songs | ||
| - Needs position field for song order | ||
| - Indexes on both foreign keys | ||
|
|
||
| 2. song_genres | ||
| - Manages N:M relationship between songs and genres | ||
| - Indexes on both foreign keys | ||
|
|
||
| Performance Considerations: | ||
| 1. User table needs hash indexes on email and username | ||
| 2. Playlist_songs needs index on position for queue management | ||
| 3. Songs table needs full text search capability | ||
| \`\`\``; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sanitize User Inputs to Prevent Injection Attacks
The function analyzeDatabaseRequirements embeds user-provided dbRequirements and projectName directly into template strings without sanitization. This could lead to injection attacks or unintended manipulation of the prompt if malicious input is provided.
Suggestion:
Implement input sanitization or escaping of special characters before embedding user inputs into the prompt. This will help prevent potential injection attacks and ensure the integrity of the prompt.
| Here is dbAnalysis content {${dbAnalysis}} | ||
|
|
||
| Rules for generation: | ||
| 1. Use ${databaseType}-specific data types and features | ||
| 2. Do not include any comments in the output | ||
| 3. Use standardized naming conventions | ||
| 4. Include all necessary constraints and indexes | ||
| 5. Generate schema in the correct creation order for dependencies | ||
|
|
||
| Your reply must start with "\`\`\`${databaseType}" and end with "\`\`\`". | ||
|
|
||
| For PostgreSQL, output format should be like: | ||
| \`\`\`sql | ||
| CREATE TYPE subscription_type_enum AS ENUM ('FREE', 'PREMIUM', 'FAMILY'); | ||
|
|
||
| CREATE TABLE users ( | ||
| id UUID DEFAULT gen_random_uuid(), | ||
| email VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, | ||
| username VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL, | ||
| password_hash VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL, | ||
| subscription_type subscription_type_enum NOT NULL DEFAULT 'FREE', | ||
| preferences JSONB DEFAULT '{"theme":"light","audioQuality":"high"}', | ||
| created_at TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, | ||
| updated_at TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP, | ||
| PRIMARY KEY (id), | ||
| UNIQUE (email), | ||
| UNIQUE (username) | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| CREATE INDEX idx_users_email ON users(email); | ||
| [Continue with other tables...] | ||
| \`\`\` | ||
|
|
||
| For MongoDB, output format should be like: | ||
| \`\`\`javascript | ||
| db.createCollection("users", { | ||
| validator: { | ||
| $jsonSchema: { | ||
| bsonType: "object", | ||
| required: ["email", "username", "password_hash", "subscription_type"], | ||
| properties: { | ||
| email: { bsonType: "string" }, | ||
| username: { bsonType: "string" }, | ||
| password_hash: { bsonType: "string" }, | ||
| subscription_type: { enum: ["FREE", "PREMIUM", "FAMILY"] } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| db.users.createIndex({ "email": 1 }, { unique: true }); | ||
| [Continue with other collections...] | ||
| \`\`\``; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sanitize User Inputs in generateDatabaseSchema Function
The function generateDatabaseSchema embeds the user-provided dbAnalysis directly into the prompt without sanitization. This poses a risk of injection attacks if dbAnalysis contains malicious content.
Suggestion:
Validate and sanitize dbAnalysis before embedding it into the prompt. Consider escaping special characters or using a templating engine that handles variable interpolation safely.
|
|
||
| while ((newlineIndex = buffer.indexOf('\n')) !== -1) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor assignment in while condition to improve readability
Assignments within conditional expressions can be confusing and may lead to unintended side effects. Refactoring the code enhances readability and maintainability.
Apply this diff to address the issue:
let newlineIndex;
+ newlineIndex = buffer.indexOf('\n');
- while ((newlineIndex = buffer.indexOf('\n')) !== -1) {
+ while (newlineIndex !== -1) {
const line = buffer.slice(0, newlineIndex).trim();
buffer = buffer.slice(newlineIndex + 1);
// existing processing...
+ newlineIndex = buffer.indexOf('\n');
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| while ((newlineIndex = buffer.indexOf('\n')) !== -1) { | |
| let newlineIndex; | |
| newlineIndex = buffer.indexOf('\n'); | |
| while (newlineIndex !== -1) { | |
| const line = buffer.slice(0, newlineIndex).trim(); | |
| buffer = buffer.slice(newlineIndex + 1); | |
| // existing processing... | |
| newlineIndex = buffer.indexOf('\n'); | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 259-259: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
Summary by CodeRabbit