Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mission_raw_server: make subscriptions async only #359

Merged

Conversation

jonathanreeves
Copy link

PR #352 introduced breaking changes for MAVSDK main. The MAVSDK PR that would fix that is here, and has been open since august: mavlink/MAVSDK#2386. In order to be able to make changes to the submodule on MAVSDK main without requiring MAVSDK 2386 to merge, these changes will need to be reverted.

@julianoes
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry @jonathanreeves, I guess I made a bit of a mess. I was meaning to merge the camera PR asap but then @JonasVautherin rightfully pointed out some things in the review which meant I had to go back and fix it up.

I'm just getting it to pass CI now, so hopefully I can merge it today or tomorrow and then I'll fix up your PR on top.

@jonathanreeves
Copy link
Author

No problem, totally understood! Mostly just glad to know I didn't misunderstand the repo states and workflows. 😆 Standing by for anything you need, just let me know if I can be helpful.

@julianoes
Copy link
Collaborator

No, my fault. Was too impatient.

…omplete, and subscribe_clear_all all strictly ASYNC
@julianoes julianoes force-pushed the feature/revert-multiple-cameras branch from 5b9c6c6 to 4dcf4d7 Compare December 18, 2024 02:23
@julianoes julianoes changed the title Revert PR 352 and remove "Outgoing Mission" subscription mission_raw_server: make subscriptions async only Dec 18, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@julianoes julianoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now this is presumably all we need :)

@julianoes julianoes merged commit 9a871c7 into mavlink:main Dec 18, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants