Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

schedulers: add reload config function #7406

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 22, 2023
Merged

Conversation

lhy1024
Copy link
Contributor

@lhy1024 lhy1024 commented Nov 21, 2023

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: Close #7257

What is changed and how does it work?

  1. allow all scheduler test to run in two modes
  2. refactor lock
  3. add reload config function

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

Release note

None.

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 21, 2023

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • JmPotato
  • rleungx

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed labels Nov 21, 2023
@@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ var (
type balanceRegionSchedulerConfig struct {
Name string `json:"name"`
Ranges []core.KeyRange `json:"ranges"`
// TODO: whether to support reload it?
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lhy1024 lhy1024 Nov 21, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to talk about the schedulers whose config only contains Ranges. Do we need to support ReloadConfig for them?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After discussion, we will keep TODO for these schedulers.

Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 21, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #7406 (0efb536) into master (8e6dcfb) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 81.04%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7406      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.24%   74.23%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         451      451              
  Lines       49180    49386     +206     
==========================================
+ Hits        36515    36663     +148     
- Misses       9430     9454      +24     
- Partials     3235     3269      +34     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 74.23% <81.04%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

pkg/schedule/schedulers/evict_slow_store.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tools/pd-ctl/pdctl/command/scheduler.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
if len(cfgData) == 0 {
return nil
}
newCfg := &shuffleHotRegionSchedulerConfig{}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When do we need to create a newCfg instead of using the old one?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When the scheduling server watches the change of config, it will call ReloadConfig to update it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mean such as splitBucketScheduler, the ReloadConfig doesn't create a newCfg.

pkg/schedule/schedulers/evict_slow_trend.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/schedule/schedulers/evict_slow_store.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Nov 22, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Nov 22, 2023
@JmPotato
Copy link
Member

/merge

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 22, 2023

@JmPotato: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 22, 2023

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 1a9a793

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 22, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 22, 2023

@lhy1024: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@lhy1024
Copy link
Contributor Author

lhy1024 commented Nov 22, 2023

/hold

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 22, 2023
Signed-off-by: lhy1024 <[email protected]>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot removed the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 22, 2023
@lhy1024
Copy link
Contributor Author

lhy1024 commented Nov 22, 2023

After discussion, we will keep TODO for these schedulers.

@lhy1024 lhy1024 removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 22, 2023
@lhy1024
Copy link
Contributor Author

lhy1024 commented Nov 22, 2023

/merge

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 22, 2023

@lhy1024: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 22, 2023

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 0efb536

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 22, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit fe84829 into tikv:master Nov 22, 2023
23 checks passed
rleungx pushed a commit to rleungx/pd that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

mcs: some schedulers cannot sync config
3 participants