Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

homogenise peptidoform strings in DDA result files #446

Conversation

Cajac102
Copy link
Contributor

2 minor changes:

  1. fix regex for modification detection in sage and FragPipe parsing (the old one included the square brackets in the match group, and therefore they did not match to the modifications in the .toml)
  2. parse charges from AlphaPept output to int

@RobbinBouwmeester RobbinBouwmeester merged commit 1e1710e into main Nov 22, 2024
8 checks passed
@RobbinBouwmeester RobbinBouwmeester deleted the 444-replace-mass-shifts-in-peptide-proforma-strings-during-fragpipe-and-sage-parsing-with-modification-names branch November 22, 2024 11:47
@Cajac102 Cajac102 restored the 444-replace-mass-shifts-in-peptide-proforma-strings-during-fragpipe-and-sage-parsing-with-modification-names branch November 22, 2024 12:42
@Cajac102
Copy link
Contributor Author

Another issue: N-terminal modifications are reported as internal modifications on the first position by i2masschroq and PEAKS (e.g. "A[MOD:00394]AAAAAAGDSDSWDADAFSVEDPVRK" instead of [MOD:00394]-AA....").

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Replace mass shifts in peptide proforma strings during FragPipe and Sage parsing with modification names
2 participants