-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Noise models and estimation methods #176
Noise models and estimation methods #176
Conversation
For example:
|
Thanks @cmaumet! Minor typo Instead of I'd also add to Noise Dependence |
Thank you @nicholst, this is updated as suggested (directly in my initial comment). |
I just noticed Noise Dependence -> Homogeneous ( Also, it is useful to arrange the lists in order of increasing complexity; for Noise Dependence a better order would be:
(CS and SC could be flipped; left out 'Homogeneous' as I wasn't sure about it). |
Following discussion today with @cmaumet, we might as well add the actual distributional assumption Noise Distribution
Note, that nonparametric inference methods assume exchangeability, and that Also note, that all of these descriptors are about the noise, as in the epsilon in |
Terms from STATO: Binomial Distribution: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/STATO_0000276 The global/local things are probably too imaging specific, but will post something over on STATO on the dependence terms. |
Thank you @nicholst: Binomial, Gaussian and Poisson distributions are now linked to the STATO terms using a |
We discussed this in NIDASH call on September 22nd (Minutes). We identified the following steps forward:
|
|
Independant -> Independent One wrinkle: What should we do? Is there "n/a" value, or just not specify it? |
Randomise & SnPM First-level
Note, it may be surprising, but sign flipping makes no assumption of equal variance. See Winkler et al. (2014) for details.
|
Thank you @nicholst, this is great! I have updated the typo and removed the |
Do you think we could merge this pull request and start discussing the definitions in a new thread? |
Can do... @cmaumet, can you start the discussion issue?
This is a proposition built with @nicholst to represent the noise models (following suggestion in #170).
We propose to characterise the noise variance (diagonal elements) and the noise dependance (off-diagonal elements):
Noise Variance
nidm:noiseVarianceHomogeneous = true
) or;nidm:noiseVarianceHomogeneous = false
).nidm:varianceSpatialModel = nidm:SpatiallyLocal
) or;nidm:varianceSpatialModel = nidm:SpatiallyRegularised
) or;nidm:varianceSpatialModel = nidm:SpatiallyGlobal
).Noise Dependence
nidm:noiseDependence = nidm:IndependentNoise
)nidm:noiseDependence = nidm:CompoundSymmetry
)nidm:noiseDependence = nidm:SeriallyCorrelatedNoise
)nidm:noiseDependence = nidm:AbitrarilyCorrelatedNoise
)nidm:DependenceSpatialModel = nidm:SpatiallyLocal
) or;nidm:DependenceSpatialModel = nidm:SpatiallyRegularised
) or;nidm:DependenceSpatialModel = nidm:SpatiallyGlobal
).