feat(backend):ux sitemap generation #50
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces two new files: Changes
Possibly related issues
Warning Rate limit exceeded@ZHallen122 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 30 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
backend/src/build-system/node/ux_sitemap_document/uxsmd.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier". (The package "eslint-plugin-prettier" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "/backend".) It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following: The plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier" was referenced from the config file in "backend/.eslintrc.js". If you still can't figure out the problem, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
backend/src/build-system/node/ux_sitemap_document/prompt/prompt.ts (2)
1-7: Fix typo in method name:generateUxsmdrompt→generateUxsmdPromptThe method name contains a typo and doesn't follow camelCase convention properly.
- generateUxsmdrompt: ( + generateUxsmdPrompt: (
1-44: Add input validation and error handlingThe method should validate its inputs to ensure they are non-empty strings and handle potential errors gracefully.
export const prompts = { generateUxsmdrompt: ( projectName: string, prdDocument: string, platform: string, ): string => { + // Validate inputs + if (!projectName?.trim()) { + throw new Error('Project name is required'); + } + if (!prdDocument?.trim()) { + throw new Error('PRD document is required'); + } + if (!platform?.trim()) { + throw new Error('Platform is required'); + } + return `You are an expert frontend develper...`; }, };backend/src/build-system/node/ux_sitemap_document/uxsmd.ts (2)
39-39: Make the model configurable instead of hardcodingHardcoding the model name
'gpt-3.5-turbo'reduces flexibility and may complicate future updates or testing with different models. Consider retrieving the model from configuration or the context to enhance adaptability.Apply this diff to retrieve the model dynamically:
-const model = 'gpt-3.5-turbo'; +const model = context.getData('model') || 'gpt-3.5-turbo';
15-18: Log warnings when context data is missingUsing default values for
projectName,prdDocument, andplatformmay mask issues if this data is unexpectedly missing. Logging warnings when these values are not present in the context can help diagnose problems during development and debugging.Consider adding warning logs:
-const projectName = - context.getData('projectName') || 'Default Project Name'; +let projectName = context.getData('projectName'); +if (!projectName) { + this.logger.warn('projectName not found in context, using default value.'); + projectName = 'Default Project Name'; +} -const prdDocument = context.getData('prdDocument') || 'Default prdDocument'; +let prdDocument = context.getData('prdDocument'); +if (!prdDocument) { + this.logger.warn('prdDocument not found in context, using default value.'); + prdDocument = 'Default prdDocument'; +} -const platform = context.getData('platform') || 'Default Platform'; +let platform = context.getData('platform'); +if (!platform) { + this.logger.warn('platform not found in context, using default value.'); + platform = 'Default Platform'; +}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
backend/src/build-system/node/ux_sitemap_document/prompt/prompt.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/node/ux_sitemap_document/uxsmd.ts(1 hunks)
| return `You are an expert frontend develper and ux designer. Your job is to analyze and expand upon the details provided, generating a Full UX Sitemap Document based on the following inputs: | ||
| - Project name: ${projectName} | ||
| - product requirements document: ${prdDocument} | ||
| - Platform: ${platform} | ||
|
|
||
| Follow these rules as a guide to ensure clarity and completeness in your UX Sitemap Document. | ||
| 1, Write you result in markdown | ||
| 2, Your reply should start with : "\`\`\`UXSitemap" and end with "\`\`\`", Use proper markdown syntax for headings, subheadings, and hierarchical lists. | ||
| 3. **Comprehensive Analysis**: Thoroughly parse the PRD to identify all core features, functionalities, and user stories. | ||
| - Focus on creating a hierarchical sitemap that covers each major section, with relevant sub-sections, pages, and key interactions. | ||
| - Ensure all primary and secondary user journeys identified in the PRD are clearly reflected. | ||
|
|
||
| 4. **Page and Navigation Structure**: Break down the sitemap into main sections, secondary sections, and individual screens. | ||
| - **Main Sections**: Identify primary sections (e.g., Home, User Account, Product Catalog) based on project requirements. | ||
| - **Secondary Sections**: Include sub-sections under each main section (e.g., "Profile" and "Order History" under "User Account"). | ||
| - **Screens and Interactions**: List specific screens and interactions that users encounter within each flow. | ||
|
|
||
| 5. **Detailed User Journeys**: | ||
| - For every user story described in the PRD, map out the step-by-step navigation path. | ||
| - Highlight sequences (e.g., 1. Home > 1.1. Explore > 1.1.1. Product Details). | ||
|
|
||
| 6. **Thorough Coverage**: | ||
| - Ensure the sitemap is fully comprehensive. If any feature from the PRD is not covered or any user journey is missing, add it to the sitemap. | ||
| - Consider the target audience and validate that all expected navigation flows and screens meet user needs. | ||
|
|
||
| 7. Ask Your self: | ||
| - Am I cover all the product requirement document? | ||
| - Am I Cover all the gloabal UI? | ||
| - Am I Cover all unique UI? | ||
| - Am I cover all the view that expect by user? | ||
| - what is all the details about UI? | ||
| - Am I cover all the cases? Is the final result 100% complete? | ||
|
|
||
| Remeber your result will be directly be use in the deveolpment. Make sure is 100% complete. | ||
| `; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Clean up prompt template content for clarity and professionalism
The prompt template contains several issues that should be addressed:
-
Typos and grammatical errors:
- Line 8: "develper" → "developer"
- Line 34-39: Multiple spelling/grammar issues ("gloabal", "Am I cover", etc.)
- Line 41: "Remeber", "deveolpment"
-
Inconsistent formatting:
- Line 14: Numbering uses comma instead of period "1,"
- Line 15: Inconsistent quote marks and spacing
- Lines 34-39: Inconsistent capitalization
Apply this diff to improve the content:
- return `You are an expert frontend develper and ux designer. Your job is to analyze and expand upon the details provided, generating a Full UX Sitemap Document based on the following inputs:
+ return `You are an expert frontend developer and UX designer. Your job is to analyze and expand upon the details provided, generating a Full UX Sitemap Document based on the following inputs:
- - Project name: ${projectName}
- - product requirements document: ${prdDocument}
- - Platform: ${platform}
+ - Project Name: ${projectName}
+ - Product Requirements Document: ${prdDocument}
+ - Platform: ${platform}
Follow these rules as a guide to ensure clarity and completeness in your UX Sitemap Document.
- 1, Write you result in markdown
- 2, Your reply should start with : "\`\`\`UXSitemap" and end with "\`\`\`", Use proper markdown syntax for headings, subheadings, and hierarchical lists.
+ 1. Write your result in markdown
+ 2. Your reply should start with "\`\`\`UXSitemap" and end with "\`\`\`". Use proper markdown syntax for headings, subheadings, and hierarchical lists.
-7. Ask Your self:
- - Am I cover all the product requirement document?
- - Am I Cover all the gloabal UI?
- - Am I Cover all unique UI?
- - Am I cover all the view that expect by user?
- - what is all the details about UI?
- - Am I cover all the cases? Is the final result 100% complete?
+ 7. Verification Checklist:
+ - Have I covered all requirements from the PRD?
+ - Have I included all global UI elements?
+ - Have I documented all unique UI components?
+ - Have I addressed all expected user views?
+ - Have I detailed all UI specifications?
+ - Have I covered all edge cases and scenarios?
-Remeber your result will be directly be use in the deveolpment. Make sure is 100% complete.
+ Remember: Your output will be used directly in development. Ensure it is complete and accurate.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return `You are an expert frontend develper and ux designer. Your job is to analyze and expand upon the details provided, generating a Full UX Sitemap Document based on the following inputs: | |
| - Project name: ${projectName} | |
| - product requirements document: ${prdDocument} | |
| - Platform: ${platform} | |
| Follow these rules as a guide to ensure clarity and completeness in your UX Sitemap Document. | |
| 1, Write you result in markdown | |
| 2, Your reply should start with : "\`\`\`UXSitemap" and end with "\`\`\`", Use proper markdown syntax for headings, subheadings, and hierarchical lists. | |
| 3. **Comprehensive Analysis**: Thoroughly parse the PRD to identify all core features, functionalities, and user stories. | |
| - Focus on creating a hierarchical sitemap that covers each major section, with relevant sub-sections, pages, and key interactions. | |
| - Ensure all primary and secondary user journeys identified in the PRD are clearly reflected. | |
| 4. **Page and Navigation Structure**: Break down the sitemap into main sections, secondary sections, and individual screens. | |
| - **Main Sections**: Identify primary sections (e.g., Home, User Account, Product Catalog) based on project requirements. | |
| - **Secondary Sections**: Include sub-sections under each main section (e.g., "Profile" and "Order History" under "User Account"). | |
| - **Screens and Interactions**: List specific screens and interactions that users encounter within each flow. | |
| 5. **Detailed User Journeys**: | |
| - For every user story described in the PRD, map out the step-by-step navigation path. | |
| - Highlight sequences (e.g., 1. Home > 1.1. Explore > 1.1.1. Product Details). | |
| 6. **Thorough Coverage**: | |
| - Ensure the sitemap is fully comprehensive. If any feature from the PRD is not covered or any user journey is missing, add it to the sitemap. | |
| - Consider the target audience and validate that all expected navigation flows and screens meet user needs. | |
| 7. Ask Your self: | |
| - Am I cover all the product requirement document? | |
| - Am I Cover all the gloabal UI? | |
| - Am I Cover all unique UI? | |
| - Am I cover all the view that expect by user? | |
| - what is all the details about UI? | |
| - Am I cover all the cases? Is the final result 100% complete? | |
| Remeber your result will be directly be use in the deveolpment. Make sure is 100% complete. | |
| `; | |
| return `You are an expert frontend developer and UX designer. Your job is to analyze and expand upon the details provided, generating a Full UX Sitemap Document based on the following inputs: | |
| - Project Name: ${projectName} | |
| - Product Requirements Document: ${prdDocument} | |
| - Platform: ${platform} | |
| Follow these rules as a guide to ensure clarity and completeness in your UX Sitemap Document. | |
| 1. Write your result in markdown | |
| 2. Your reply should start with "\`\`\`UXSitemap" and end with "\`\`\`". Use proper markdown syntax for headings, subheadings, and hierarchical lists. | |
| 3. **Comprehensive Analysis**: Thoroughly parse the PRD to identify all core features, functionalities, and user stories. | |
| - Focus on creating a hierarchical sitemap that covers each major section, with relevant sub-sections, pages, and key interactions. | |
| - Ensure all primary and secondary user journeys identified in the PRD are clearly reflected. | |
| 4. **Page and Navigation Structure**: Break down the sitemap into main sections, secondary sections, and individual screens. | |
| - **Main Sections**: Identify primary sections (e.g., Home, User Account, Product Catalog) based on project requirements. | |
| - **Secondary Sections**: Include sub-sections under each main section (e.g., "Profile" and "Order History" under "User Account"). | |
| - **Screens and Interactions**: List specific screens and interactions that users encounter within each flow. | |
| 5. **Detailed User Journeys**: | |
| - For every user story described in the PRD, map out the step-by-step navigation path. | |
| - Highlight sequences (e.g., 1. Home > 1.1. Explore > 1.1.1. Product Details). | |
| 6. **Thorough Coverage**: | |
| - Ensure the sitemap is fully comprehensive. If any feature from the PRD is not covered or any user journey is missing, add it to the sitemap. | |
| - Consider the target audience and validate that all expected navigation flows and screens meet user needs. | |
| 7. Verification Checklist: | |
| - Have I covered all requirements from the PRD? | |
| - Have I included all global UI elements? | |
| - Have I documented all unique UI components? | |
| - Have I addressed all expected user views? | |
| - Have I detailed all UI specifications? | |
| - Have I covered all edge cases and scenarios? | |
| Remember: Your output will be used directly in development. Ensure it is complete and accurate. | |
| `; |
| const prompt = prompts.generateUxsmdrompt( | ||
| projectName, | ||
| prdDocument, | ||
| platform, | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo in method name generateUxsmdrompt
The method name generateUxsmdrompt appears to be misspelled. It should likely be generateUxsmdPrompt to accurately reflect its purpose and maintain consistency.
Apply this diff to fix the typo:
-const prompt = prompts.generateUxsmdrompt(
+const prompt = prompts.generateUxsmdPrompt(📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const prompt = prompts.generateUxsmdrompt( | |
| projectName, | |
| prdDocument, | |
| platform, | |
| ); | |
| const prompt = prompts.generateUxsmdPrompt( | |
| projectName, | |
| prdDocument, | |
| platform, | |
| ); |
| const prdContent = modelProvider.chatSync( | ||
| { | ||
| content: prompt, | ||
| }, | ||
| model, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| this.logger.log('Received full UXSMD content from LLM server.'); | ||
| return prdContent; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use asynchronous method chat instead of chatSync and fix variable naming
Using the synchronous method chatSync inside an asynchronous function can block the event loop and degrade performance. Additionally, the variable prdContent is inconsistent with uxsmdContent used elsewhere. It's better to use the asynchronous chat method and maintain consistent variable names.
Apply this diff to use the asynchronous chat method and correct variable names:
-const prdContent = modelProvider.chatSync(
- {
- content: prompt,
- },
- model,
-);
+const uxsmdContent = await modelProvider.chat(
+ [
+ {
+ role: 'user',
+ content: prompt,
+ },
+ ],
+ model,
+);Update the log message and return statement accordingly:
-this.logger.log('Received full UXSMD content from LLM server.');
-return prdContent;
+this.logger.log('Received UXSMD content from LLM server.');
+return uxsmdContent;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const prdContent = modelProvider.chatSync( | |
| { | |
| content: prompt, | |
| }, | |
| model, | |
| ); | |
| this.logger.log('Received full UXSMD content from LLM server.'); | |
| return prdContent; | |
| const uxsmdContent = await modelProvider.chat( | |
| [ | |
| { | |
| role: 'user', | |
| content: prompt, | |
| }, | |
| ], | |
| model, | |
| ); | |
| this.logger.log('Received UXSMD content from LLM server.'); | |
| return uxsmdContent; |
| const uxsmdContent = await this.generateUXSMDFromLLM(prompt); | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| success: true, | ||
| data: uxsmdContent, | ||
| }; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for failures in generateUXSMDFromLLM
If generateUXSMDFromLLM fails, the error is not caught, which could cause the build process to fail unexpectedly. Implement error handling to manage potential failures gracefully and provide meaningful feedback.
Apply this diff to handle potential errors:
-const uxsmdContent = await this.generateUXSMDFromLLM(prompt);
-
-return {
- success: true,
- data: uxsmdContent,
-};
+try {
+ const uxsmdContent = await this.generateUXSMDFromLLM(prompt);
+ return {
+ success: true,
+ data: uxsmdContent,
+ };
+} catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error('Error generating UXSMD:', error);
+ return {
+ success: false,
+ error: error.message,
+ };
+}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
backend/src/build-system/node/ux_sitemap_document/uxsmd.ts (2)
41-41: Consider making the model configurableThe model identifier is hardcoded to 'gpt-3.5-turbo'. Consider making it configurable through environment variables or configuration files for better flexibility and maintainability.
Apply this diff to make the model configurable:
- const model = 'gpt-3.5-turbo'; + const model = process.env.LLM_MODEL || 'gpt-3.5-turbo';Also, add this to your environment variables documentation:
LLM_MODEL: The identifier for the language model to use (default: 'gpt-3.5-turbo')
38-52: Consider implementing caching for LLM responsesSince LLM calls can be expensive and time-consuming, consider implementing a caching mechanism for similar prompts. This could significantly improve performance and reduce costs for repeated generations with similar inputs.
Key considerations:
- Cache key could be a hash of the normalized prompt
- Cache TTL should be configurable
- Consider using Redis or a similar distributed cache if running in a clustered environment
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
backend/src/build-system/node/ux_sitemap_document/uxsmd.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
backend/src/build-system/node/ux_sitemap_document/uxsmd.ts (1)
1-9: LGTM! Clean implementation of the BuildHandler interface.
The imports are well-organized, and the class structure properly implements the BuildHandler interface with appropriate logging setup.
| // Generate the prompt dynamically | ||
| const prompt = prompts.generateUxsmdrompt( | ||
| projectName, | ||
| args as string, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add type validation for args parameter
The direct type casting of args to string is unsafe and could lead to runtime errors if the input is not a string.
Apply this diff to add type validation:
- args as string,
+ typeof args === 'string' ? args : String(args),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| args as string, | |
| typeof args === 'string' ? args : String(args), |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes